15.01.2015 Views

2014fwc_tsg_report_15082014_neutral

2014fwc_tsg_report_15082014_neutral

2014fwc_tsg_report_15082014_neutral

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44<br />

Technical and tactical analysis<br />

TECHNICAL AND TACTICAL ANALYSIS<br />

The 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil was<br />

marked by top quality and attacking football,<br />

excellent players and a positive general<br />

football philosophy. The teams’ objectives<br />

were to score and win matches instead of<br />

trying not to lose or concede. This led to a glut<br />

of goals, 171 in total at an impressive average<br />

of 2.67 goals per match, which matched the<br />

record set in France in 1998.<br />

Praise has to be given to the coaches and<br />

players who contributed first and foremost to<br />

this outstanding competition.<br />

The World Cup also witnessed the rise and<br />

development of countries such as Costa Rica<br />

and Algeria, who successfully and efficiently<br />

challenged the more established teams.<br />

Speed, tempo and power football has never<br />

been so high. Many matches were end-to-end<br />

affairs, and a lot of games were not decided<br />

until the very end. Often little details made all<br />

the difference between winning and losing.<br />

The most successful teams had key players in<br />

all areas who had a major influence with their<br />

play, work rate, personality and outstanding<br />

performances.<br />

Moreover, this World Cup was an extremely<br />

balanced affair. Eight of the 16 matches in<br />

the second stage went to extra time, and<br />

four all the way to a penalty shoot-out. This<br />

underlines how close the teams are together<br />

as well as the good development work being<br />

done by the member associations.<br />

Shapes<br />

The overriding tactic was to use the players<br />

in the position in which they could give their<br />

best for the team. Organisation was one of<br />

the keys to success. However, teams tended<br />

to use flexible systems rather than static<br />

formations, with players assuming different<br />

positions but also sticking to their role when<br />

the match situation required it. The players<br />

were thereby able to make the best use of<br />

their talent.<br />

The most successful teams were well<br />

organised and had effective shapes, usually<br />

with four at the back. However, systems with<br />

three central defenders are on the rise again<br />

(e.g. Chile, Netherlands, Uruguay, Mexico and<br />

Costa Rica). Defenders showed that they were<br />

comfortable on the ball and in one-versus-one<br />

situations.<br />

The best teams also played with one holding<br />

player in front of the defence (instead of two<br />

as seen at South Africa 2010) and forming a<br />

defensive triangle with the central defenders.<br />

Two wide midfielders assisted in both attack<br />

and defence. Full-backs regularly pushed<br />

forward, providing width in attack and<br />

creating a number of crossing options.<br />

Most teams played with two strikers (if not<br />

three), and the few teams that played with<br />

one lone attacker left the competition early.<br />

Play was built up consistently from defence<br />

through midfield to attack. Long balls to the<br />

strikers were rarely used (and mostly only<br />

when a team was tired or trailing with only<br />

minutes to go).<br />

Successful teams were not limited to just<br />

one creative player, and instead they gave<br />

responsibility to a number of players with a<br />

view towards working as a unit but still with<br />

creativity. Teamwork was essential, as were<br />

key players who worked hard for the team,<br />

such as Neymar (Brazil, 10), Messi (Argentina,<br />

10), Robben (Netherlands, 11), Kroos<br />

(Germany, 18) and Rodríguez (Colombia, 10)<br />

who all made a difference and were able to<br />

decide a game on their own.<br />

Overall, it was vital that the team’s shape was<br />

in line with an effective system of play.<br />

System of play<br />

Most teams’ build-up play was on the floor,<br />

and long balls were often not successful.<br />

Teams started games by pressing their<br />

opponents aggressively in the first 15 minutes<br />

before adopting a semi-high pressing concept<br />

in midfield to create space for swift counterattacks<br />

once back in possession to get behind<br />

the opponent’s defence.<br />

Screening midfielders often stayed back<br />

to give the full-backs the opportunity to<br />

push forward. In general, one of the strikers<br />

dropped back into central midfield after<br />

losing possession, and the backline of the<br />

defending team did not drop less than<br />

40 metres in front of their own goal. Teams<br />

defended in a compact block in a high line<br />

and overloaded the area where the ball was.<br />

The central areas were mostly crowded as<br />

the wingers dropped into the centre to close<br />

down space after possession had been lost.<br />

In terms of attacking play, the quality of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!