05.01.2015 Views

ON 17TH MAY, 2002 - ConstitutionNet

ON 17TH MAY, 2002 - ConstitutionNet

ON 17TH MAY, 2002 - ConstitutionNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

83<br />

elected directly by the people so that they can be accountable to the people. We also need chief officers employees of the local<br />

government to be appointed by the local authorities themselves. Not the minister of local government sitting in Nairobi not<br />

knowing the problems there using corruption, then people who are corrupt there and people who come and take people’s<br />

money and take plots, we don’t want that, we want local officers to be elected by the councils themselves so that they can be<br />

accountable to the mayor.<br />

The other issue I wanted to talk about is that there has been a major debate on whether we need a Prime Ministrial system in<br />

the country. Again if you look at the constitution experience in this country, in the countries in Africa you will see that this system<br />

have not worked where the powers of the executive are divided between a President and a Prime Minister, there is always a<br />

trouble for power between the two arms and it becomes very difficult to run the government. It might not work if we have to<br />

split the powers of the executive, if we have to create different tempers of power, We will not have a stable government. We<br />

will still need a President who has powers who can be able to bring the country together in times of crisis, who can offer<br />

leadership. If we have to create Prime Ministrial position then we cannot be able to give that post a lot of powers that can rival<br />

the powers of the President. The other issue (interruption)<br />

Com. Ratanya: What do you recommend To have that post or not<br />

Gitirau Munya: Not to have it. Infact the proposals of a Prime Ministrial position is coming from political parties with<br />

motives that are not very good. The interest of political parties is to have ethnic coalitions spread powers and reward people.<br />

That’s not why we are reviewing the constitution, why we are reviewing this constitution, is to be able to write a lasting<br />

constitution. A constitution that can sustain this country for many many many years, its not to serve short term interest of<br />

political ballon at the top. We still remain with our Presidential system, it has worked, it has not worked very well, but it has<br />

sustained this country for more than 30 years.<br />

The other issue I wanted to address Mr. Chairman, is the issue of land, somebody has already addressed it but I would also<br />

want to add my voice to it. Land is a very important resource in this country, we are an agricultural society, it is what sustains<br />

us, we need institutions that can manage our natural resources including land very well and that is why we need a land<br />

commissioner, but not a land commissioner just appointed by the President because again it wont work. The President will put<br />

his own promine to the land commissioner who will continue to be distributing land to friends, who will continue aligning their<br />

pockets with kickbacks and whatever. We need a land commission which is appointed by parliament. (end of tape 3 part A)<br />

We have historical monuments that can bring money for today’s country but because the President have a lot of powers in<br />

allocation of land, he has been taking important natural resources taking them to individuals. We need an institution that can<br />

manage our national monument<br />

Com. Ratanya:<br />

Josephat you have one minute to sumerize please.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!