14.03.2015 Views

vaata faili - Viru Peipsi

vaata faili - Viru Peipsi

vaata faili - Viru Peipsi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF THE RIVERS IN VIRU AND PEIPSI<br />

CATCHMENT AREAS FOR COMPILATION OF WATER<br />

MANAGEMENT PLANS<br />

Summary<br />

The aim of the project was assess the chemical and ecological status of rivers in <strong>Viru</strong> and <strong>Peipsi</strong><br />

catchment areas and classification of rivers according to physical-chemical indicators.<br />

For analysing data of the national monitoring programme in 31monitoring stations , additional<br />

monitoring in 52 stations was carried out. The list of additionally monitored rivers was chosen by<br />

the Life programme coordinator. First of all were chosen objects of insufficient water quality due<br />

to waste water impact, bur also stations of agricultural and background catchment areas.<br />

The report contains following chapters<br />

6. Main task and investigated objects.<br />

7. Overview of hydrology of rivers and land-use in the catchment area<br />

8. Assessment of human impact: analyses of point sources, pollution ingredients of the<br />

waste water, agricultural diffuse pollution, background load and source apportionment of<br />

different pollution sources<br />

9. Status of rivers and adequacy to the quality requirements: Drinking Water Directive, Fish<br />

Directive, Directive of path waters, Nitrate directive.<br />

10. Overview of the monitoring programme and analyse: the water quality classes of rivers<br />

and analyse of quality indicators of water classes; typisation of rivers, proposals for future<br />

in monitoring programmes<br />

11. There are several data in the Annexes for compilation of water management plans<br />

Despite of construction new waste-water plants the chemical status of rivers was worse than<br />

expected. In most cases plants do not work as needed and downstream of discharge of waste<br />

water are rivers in bad conditions and do not correspond to the requirements. Discharges from<br />

329 point-sources don not correspond to the requirements in 186 cases.<br />

The main problem in fish rivers is high content of nitite and ammonium-nitrogen<br />

The runoff from agricultural catchments is small and in the same level as background values<br />

from natural catchments due to low level of agricultural pollution and use of fertilizers. The selfpurification<br />

processes and retention-time are also impontant factors in decreasing agricultural<br />

pollution<br />

Long-term trends show decreasing nitrogen content in <strong>Peipsi</strong> rivers, but phosphorus content has<br />

been in the same level. Decreasing N/P ratio causes better conditions for cyanobacteria growth in<br />

the lake and coastal areas<br />

Only 13 rivers stations from 84 corresponded to the good quality class requirements. The main<br />

problems were higher content of nutrients in the rivers<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!