19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1 Polarizability Parameters for Atoms<br />

Polarizability (A˚ 3<br />

)<br />

——————————————————————————————<br />

Atom Applequist et al. a Tholeb Experimental or ab <strong>in</strong>itioc H (alkane) 0.135 0.514 0.667<br />

H (alcohol) 0.135 — —<br />

H (aldehyde) 0.167 — —<br />

H (amide) 0.161 — —<br />

C (alkane) 0.878 1.405 1.76<br />

C (carbonyl) 0.616 — —<br />

N (amide) 0.530 1.105 1.10<br />

N (nitrile) 0.52 — —<br />

O (alcohol) 0.465 0.862 0.802<br />

O (ether) 0.465 — —<br />

O (carbonyl) 0.434 — —<br />

F 0.32 — 0.557<br />

Cl 1.91 — 2.<strong>18</strong><br />

Br 2.88 — 3.05<br />

I 4.69 — 5.35<br />

a Ref. 39.<br />

b Ref. 41<br />

c Ref. 42.<br />

Alternatively, the polarization catastrophe can be avoided by screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(attenuat<strong>in</strong>g) the dipole–dipole <strong>in</strong>teraction at small distances. 41 As with the<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g of the static field, screen<strong>in</strong>g of the dipole–dipole <strong>in</strong>teraction can be<br />

physically <strong>in</strong>terpreted as correct<strong>in</strong>g for the fact that the electronic distribution<br />

is not well represented by po<strong>in</strong>t charges and dipoles at small distances. 39,41,43<br />

Mathematically, screen<strong>in</strong>g avoids the s<strong>in</strong>gularities such as those <strong>in</strong> Eqs. [15]<br />

and [16]. The Thole procedure for screen<strong>in</strong>g is to <strong>in</strong>troduce a scal<strong>in</strong>g distance<br />

sij ¼ 1:662ðaiajÞ 1=6 . This results <strong>in</strong> a charge density radius of 1.662 A˚ , for<br />

example, between atoms with a polarizability of 1 A˚ 3 . The dipole field<br />

tensor is thus changed to<br />

0<br />

1<br />

Tij ¼ð4v 3<br />

3v 4 Þ 1 3<br />

I v4<br />

r3 r5 Polarizable Po<strong>in</strong>t Dipoles 95<br />

x2 xy xz<br />

@<br />

A ½17Š<br />

yx y 2 yz<br />

zx zy z 2<br />

where v ¼ r=sij. Tij is unchanged if r is greater than sij. Thole’s polarizability<br />

parameters, together with the scale factor 1.662, were selected to optimize the<br />

molecular polarizabilities for a set of 16 molecules (Table 1). Unlike Applequist,<br />

Thole assigns only one polarizability per atom <strong>in</strong>dependent of its valence<br />

state and does not assign polarizabilities to halide atoms. The Thole parameters<br />

are closer to the experimental and ab <strong>in</strong>itio polarizabilities. 42 Although<br />

the atomic polarizabilities of Applequist and Thole are different, the result<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!