19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112 Polarizability <strong>in</strong> Computer Simulations<br />

limit, and methods constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the charge based on the bond<strong>in</strong>g network<br />

are an extension of EE models that appear to be successful at controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the coherence lengths. 149 There now exist classical models that can describe<br />

the charge transfer reasonably across the full range of a dissociat<strong>in</strong>g bond,<br />

but these are currently less well developed. 157<br />

The polarization energy <strong>in</strong> the EE models can be compared directly to<br />

that <strong>in</strong> the polarizable po<strong>in</strong>t dipole and shell models. Consider the first term<br />

<strong>in</strong> Eq. [43],<br />

X<br />

X X<br />

w<br />

i 2 a<br />

0 i qi þ 1<br />

2<br />

i 2 a j 2 a<br />

qi qj JijðrijÞ E gp<br />

a<br />

This term represents the energy required to <strong>in</strong>duce charges qi on the atoms of<br />

molecule a <strong>in</strong> the electric field of its neighbors, relative to the energy of the<br />

isolated molecule. This quantity is simply the polarization energy of the molecule.<br />

The polarization energy of the full system can thus be written<br />

Upol ¼ X X<br />

w 0 i qi þ 1 X X<br />

qi qj JijðrijÞ E<br />

2<br />

gp<br />

" #<br />

a<br />

a<br />

i 2 a<br />

i 2 a j 2 a<br />

which can be compared to Eqs. [9] and [26]. 10<br />

There exist other models that treat polarizability us<strong>in</strong>g variable charges<br />

<strong>in</strong> a way similar to the fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g charge model. 22,53,127,143,158 In the Sprik<br />

and Kle<strong>in</strong> 22 model for water, four charge sites are located near the oxygen<br />

atom <strong>in</strong> a tetrahedral geometry, <strong>in</strong> addition to the three atom-centered permanent<br />

charges. The tetrahedron of charges is used to represent an <strong>in</strong>duced dipole<br />

moment on the oxygen center. This approach differs from a polarizable po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

dipole model <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g a dipole of f<strong>in</strong>ite extent. It also differs from a shell model<br />

<strong>in</strong> that the po<strong>in</strong>t charges are fixed <strong>in</strong> the molecular frame. Consequently, the<br />

Sprik–Kle<strong>in</strong> model should perhaps best be considered an entirely different type<br />

of model. The model of Zhu, S<strong>in</strong>gh, and Rob<strong>in</strong>son 158 is similar to the Sprik–<br />

Kle<strong>in</strong> model, but it has no permanent charges. The four charge sites, two on<br />

hydrogen atoms and two on lone-pair positions 1 A˚ from the oxygen atom, are<br />

all variables coupled to the electric field. For both these models, the coupl<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

described by the polarizability, a, just as with other dipole polarizable models.<br />

Wilson and Madden 159 described a model for ions <strong>in</strong> which charge is transferred<br />

between ends of a rigid, rotat<strong>in</strong>g rod. In the model of Perng et al., 143<br />

the charge, qi, on an atom is equal to a permanent value, q0 i , plus an <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

part, dqi. The <strong>in</strong>duced charge is dependent on the electrostatic potential at that<br />

site and all the <strong>in</strong>duced charges are coupled through Coulombic <strong>in</strong>teractions,<br />

similar to the fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g charge models. In the polarizable po<strong>in</strong>t charge (PPC)<br />

model of Svishchev et al., 53 charges are coupled directly to the electric field at<br />

that site, so this model is slightly different from the fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g charge model.<br />

½47Š<br />

½48Š

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!