Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>18</strong>6 Charge-Transfer Reactions <strong>in</strong> Condensed Phases<br />
Here ‘‘<strong>in</strong>v’’ stands for an <strong>in</strong>variant <strong>in</strong> respect to transformation consistent with<br />
the symmetry of the system. For quantum mechanical operators, this means<br />
unitary transformations. The parameter e <strong>in</strong> Eq. [107] quantifies the extent<br />
of mix<strong>in</strong>g between two adiabatic gas-phase states <strong>in</strong>duced by the <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
with the solvent. For a dipolar solute, it is determ<strong>in</strong>ed through the adiabatic<br />
differential and the transition dipole moments<br />
e ¼ 1 þ 4m2 12<br />
m 2 12<br />
1=2<br />
½113Š<br />
The differential and transition dipoles can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed from experiment: the<br />
former from the Stark spectroscopy 75,76 and the latter from absorption or<br />
emission <strong>in</strong>tensities (see below).<br />
The parameter e should not be confused with the actual difference <strong>in</strong><br />
electronic occupation numbers of the two CT states. When the eigenfunctions<br />
f ~ fþðY adÞ; ~ f ðYadÞg correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the eigenstates F ðYadÞ are represented<br />
as a l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the wave functions of the adiabatic basis, ff1; f2g, ~f þðY ad ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />
Þ¼ 1 f ðYad q<br />
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />
Þf1<br />
þ f ðYad q<br />
Þf2<br />
~f ðY ad ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />
Þ¼ f ðYad q<br />
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />
Þf1<br />
þ 1 f ðYad q<br />
½114Š<br />
Þ<br />
then the parameter f ðY ad Þ def<strong>in</strong>es the occupation number of the adiabatic state<br />
1 on the lower CT free energy surface at the reaction coord<strong>in</strong>ate Y ad . For CT<br />
transitions <strong>in</strong> the normal region, two equilibrium m<strong>in</strong>ima are located on the<br />
lower CT free energy surface. The occupation number difference <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
and <strong>in</strong>itial states can thus be def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
z ¼j1 f ðY 1 Þ f ðY 2 Þj ½115Š<br />
where Y 1 and Y 2 are two m<strong>in</strong>ima positioned on the lower CT surface<br />
(Figure 12). In contrast, when transitions between the lower and upper CT<br />
surfaces occur <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>verted CT region, the occupation number difference<br />
becomes<br />
f 2<br />
z ¼jf ðY þ Þ f ðY Þj ½116Š<br />
where now Y þ and Y def<strong>in</strong>e the positions of equilibrium on the upper and<br />
lower CT surfaces, respectively (Figure 13). Figure 14 illustrates the difference<br />
<strong>in</strong> the dependence of the occupation number difference on e <strong>in</strong> the normal<br />
and <strong>in</strong>verted CT regions. The parameter z is <strong>in</strong>deed close to e for reactions<br />
with j F I s j lI . As the absolute value of the equilibrium energy gap <strong>in</strong>creases,