Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
where ‘‘þ’’ and ‘‘ ’’ correspond to i ¼ 1 and i ¼ 2, respectively. Here, we outl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the procedure of build<strong>in</strong>g the CT free energy surfaces <strong>in</strong> the diabatic representation<br />
and then discuss advantages of us<strong>in</strong>g the adiabatic representation.<br />
When the donor–acceptor complex is placed <strong>in</strong> a solvent, its Hamiltonian<br />
changes due to the solute–solvent <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
H<strong>in</strong>t ¼ ^<br />
E P ½30Š<br />
Here, the dot product of two calligraphic letters stands for an <strong>in</strong>tegral over the<br />
solvent volume V<br />
ð<br />
E^ P¼ ^E P dr ½31Š<br />
V<br />
and ^ E is the electric field operator of the transferred electron coupled to the<br />
polarizability of the solvent P. The system Hamiltonian then becomes<br />
H ¼ HB þ X<br />
ðIiEiPÞa þ i ai þ ðHab Eab PÞ<br />
a þ<br />
b aa þ a þ a ab ½32Š<br />
i¼a;b<br />
where HB refers to the Hamiltonian of the solvent (thermal bath); Ei ¼<br />
hfij ^ Ejfii and Eab ¼hfaj ^ Ejfbi. The solvent Hamiltonian HB <strong>in</strong>cludes two components. The first one is<br />
an <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically quantum part that describes polarization of the electronic<br />
clouds of the solvent molecules. This polarization is given by the electronic solvent<br />
polarization, Pe. The second part is due to thermal nuclear motions that<br />
can be classical or quantum <strong>in</strong> character. Here, to simplify the discussion, we<br />
consider only the classical spectrum of nuclear fluctuations result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
the classical field of nuclear polarization, Pn. Fluctuations of the solvent<br />
polarization field are usually well described with<strong>in</strong> the Gaussian approximation,<br />
35 lead<strong>in</strong>g to the quadratic solvent Hamiltonian<br />
HB ¼ HB½PnŠþHB½PeŠ ¼1 2 Pn w 1<br />
n<br />
Paradigm of Free Energy Surfaces 161<br />
Pn þ 1<br />
2<br />
o 2<br />
e<br />
Pe _ _<br />
Pe þPe w 1<br />
e Pe ½33Š<br />
Here, we and wn are the Gaussian response functions of the electronic and<br />
nuclear solvent polarization, respectively; Pe _ is the time derivative of the electronic<br />
polarization field enter<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g k<strong>in</strong>etic energy term.<br />
In terms of the Gaussian solvent model, 35 the nuclear response function is<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed through the correlator of correspond<strong>in</strong>g polarization fluctuations<br />
(high-temperature limit of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem 36 )<br />
w nðr r 0 Þ¼b hdPnðrÞ dPnðr 0 Þi ½34Š<br />
In Eq. [33], oe denotes a characteristic frequency of the optical excitations of<br />
the solvent. The k<strong>in</strong>etic energy of the nuclear polarization Pn is left out <strong>in</strong>