19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where ‘‘þ’’ and ‘‘ ’’ correspond to i ¼ 1 and i ¼ 2, respectively. Here, we outl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the procedure of build<strong>in</strong>g the CT free energy surfaces <strong>in</strong> the diabatic representation<br />

and then discuss advantages of us<strong>in</strong>g the adiabatic representation.<br />

When the donor–acceptor complex is placed <strong>in</strong> a solvent, its Hamiltonian<br />

changes due to the solute–solvent <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

H<strong>in</strong>t ¼ ^<br />

E P ½30Š<br />

Here, the dot product of two calligraphic letters stands for an <strong>in</strong>tegral over the<br />

solvent volume V<br />

ð<br />

E^ P¼ ^E P dr ½31Š<br />

V<br />

and ^ E is the electric field operator of the transferred electron coupled to the<br />

polarizability of the solvent P. The system Hamiltonian then becomes<br />

H ¼ HB þ X<br />

ðIiEiPÞa þ i ai þ ðHab Eab PÞ<br />

a þ<br />

b aa þ a þ a ab ½32Š<br />

i¼a;b<br />

where HB refers to the Hamiltonian of the solvent (thermal bath); Ei ¼<br />

hfij ^ Ejfii and Eab ¼hfaj ^ Ejfbi. The solvent Hamiltonian HB <strong>in</strong>cludes two components. The first one is<br />

an <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically quantum part that describes polarization of the electronic<br />

clouds of the solvent molecules. This polarization is given by the electronic solvent<br />

polarization, Pe. The second part is due to thermal nuclear motions that<br />

can be classical or quantum <strong>in</strong> character. Here, to simplify the discussion, we<br />

consider only the classical spectrum of nuclear fluctuations result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the classical field of nuclear polarization, Pn. Fluctuations of the solvent<br />

polarization field are usually well described with<strong>in</strong> the Gaussian approximation,<br />

35 lead<strong>in</strong>g to the quadratic solvent Hamiltonian<br />

HB ¼ HB½PnŠþHB½PeŠ ¼1 2 Pn w 1<br />

n<br />

Paradigm of Free Energy Surfaces 161<br />

Pn þ 1<br />

2<br />

o 2<br />

e<br />

Pe _ _<br />

Pe þPe w 1<br />

e Pe ½33Š<br />

Here, we and wn are the Gaussian response functions of the electronic and<br />

nuclear solvent polarization, respectively; Pe _ is the time derivative of the electronic<br />

polarization field enter<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g k<strong>in</strong>etic energy term.<br />

In terms of the Gaussian solvent model, 35 the nuclear response function is<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed through the correlator of correspond<strong>in</strong>g polarization fluctuations<br />

(high-temperature limit of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem 36 )<br />

w nðr r 0 Þ¼b hdPnðrÞ dPnðr 0 Þi ½34Š<br />

In Eq. [33], oe denotes a characteristic frequency of the optical excitations of<br />

the solvent. The k<strong>in</strong>etic energy of the nuclear polarization Pn is left out <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!