19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the radiation is the perturbation that drives the electronic excitation. The<br />

time-dependent <strong>in</strong>teraction Hamiltonian is<br />

f ðnDÞ ^m0 EðtÞ ½125Š<br />

where the parameter f ðnDÞ accounts for the deviation of the local field act<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the solute dipole from the external field EðtÞ; nD is the solvent refractive<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex. Dielectric theories 91 predict for spherical cavities<br />

f ðnDÞ ¼ 3n2 D<br />

2n2 ½126Š<br />

D þ 1<br />

The perturbation given by Eq. [125] mixes the electronic states for which<br />

the off-diagonal matrix element of the dipole operator, mjk, is nonzero. The<br />

latter is called the transition dipole. 49 Mix<strong>in</strong>g of electronic states by a timedependent<br />

external field leads to the dependence of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g electronic<br />

state populations on time. The rate constant of the population k<strong>in</strong>etics is<br />

given by the transition probability. Quantum mechanical perturbation theory,<br />

limited to the first order <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction perturbation, is commonly used to<br />

calculate the one-photon transition probability and absorption <strong>in</strong>tensity. 15,92<br />

This formalism, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> relation between absorption<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity and the probability of spontaneous emission, 49,92 leads to experimental<br />

observables, the ext<strong>in</strong>ction coefficient of absorption, EðnÞ (cm 1 M 1 ), and<br />

the emission rate, IemðnÞ (number of photons per unit frequency), as functions<br />

of the light frequency n. They are given by the follow<strong>in</strong>g relations:<br />

and<br />

EðnÞ<br />

n ¼<br />

8p3NA f<br />

3000 ðln 10Þ c<br />

2ðnDÞ G ðnÞ ½127Š<br />

IemðnÞ ¼ 64p4n3 3c3 nDf 2 ðnDÞGþðnÞ ½128Š<br />

In Eq. [127], NA is the Avogadro number, and c <strong>in</strong> Eqs. [127] and [128] is the<br />

speed of light <strong>in</strong> vacuum.<br />

The ext<strong>in</strong>ction coefficient and emission rate are def<strong>in</strong>ed through the spectral<br />

density function G ðnÞ that comb<strong>in</strong>es the effects of solvent-<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong>homogeneous<br />

broaden<strong>in</strong>g and vibrational excitations of the donor–acceptor<br />

complex. A substantial simplification of the description can be achieved if<br />

the two types of nuclear motions are not coupled to each other. The spectral<br />

density G ðnÞ is then given by the convolution 17<br />

nD<br />

Optical Band Shape 193<br />

G ðnÞ ¼j~m12ðhnÞj 2<br />

ð<br />

FCWD s ðxÞFCWD v ðn xÞdx ½129Š

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!