Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

146 Polarizability in Computer Simulations
236. E. J. Dodson, G. J. Davis, V. S. Lamzin, G. N. Murshudov, and K. S. Wilson, Structure, 6,
685–690 (1998). Validation Tools: Can They Indicate the Information Content of Macromolecular
Crystal Structures?
237. P. Hobza and J. S˘poner, Chem. Rev., 99, 3247–3276 (1999). Structure, Energics, and
Dynamics of the Nucleic Acid Base Pairs: Nonempirical Ab Initio Calculations.
238. J. N. Wilson and R. M. Curtis, J. Phys. Chem., 74, 187–196 (1970). Dipole Polarizabilities of
Ions in Alkali Halide Crystals.
239. G. D. Mahan, Solid State Ionics, 1, 29–45 (1980). Polarizability of Ions in Crystals.
240. P. W. Fowler and P. A. Madden, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 29, 1035–1042 (1984).
In-crystal Polarizabilities of Alkali and Halide Ions.
241. J. K. Badenhoop and F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys., 107, 5422–5432 (1997). Natural Steric
Analysis: Ab Initio van der Waals Radii of Atoms and Ions.
242. A. Warshel and R. M. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 6218–6226 (1980). An Emprical
Valence Bond Approach for Comparing Reactions in Solutions and in Enzymes.
243. M. J. L. Sangster, Solid State Commun., 15, 471–474 (1974). Properties of Diatomic
Molecules from Dynamical Models for Alkali Halide Crystals.
244. L. Greengard, and V. Rokhlin, J. Comput. Phys., 73, 325–348 (1987). A Fast Algorithm for
Particle Simulations.
245. H.-Q. Ding, N. Karasawa, and W. A. Goddard III, J. Chem. Phys., 97, 4309–4315 (1992).
Atom Level Simulations of a Million Particles: The Cell Multipole Method for Coulomb and
London Nonbond Interactions.
246. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulation Using Particles, Institute of
Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, 1988.
247. T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys., 93, 10089–10092 (1993). Particle Mesh
Ewald: An N log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems.
248. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys., 64, 253–287 (1921). Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer
Gitterpotentiale.
249. D. M. Heyes, J. Chem. Phys., 74, 1924–1929 (1981). Electrostatic Potentials and Fields in
Infinite Point Charge Lattices.
250. M. Tuckerman, B. J. Berne, and G. J. Martyna, J. Chem. Phys., 97, 1990–2001 (1992).
Reversible Multiple Time Scale Molecular Dynamics.
251. S. J. Stuart, R. Zhou, and B. J. Berne, J. Chem. Phys., 105, 1426–1436 (1996). Molecular
Dynamics with Multiple Timescales: The Selection of Efficient Reference System Propagators.
252. P. Kaatz, E. A. Donley, and D. P. Shelton, J. Chem. Phys., 180, 849–856 (1998). A
Comparison of Molecular Hyperpolarizabilities from Gas and Liquid Phase Measurements.
253. G. Maroulis, J. Chem. Phys., 94, 1182–1190 (1991). Hyperpolarizability of H2O. 254. The linear increase in polarization with molecule size assumes that the characteristic
polarizability a is small compared to the characteristic volume per polarizable unit:
a r3 . See Eqs. [15] and [16]. In cases where this approximation does not hold, the
polarizability will increase faster than linearly with system size, leading to a polarization
catastrophe.
255. B. L. Bush, C. I. Bayly, and T. A. Halgren, J. Comput. Chem., 20, 1495–1516 (1999).
Consensus Bond-Charge Increments Fitted to Electrostatic Potential or Field of Many
Compounds: Application to MMFF94 Training Set.