19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 The Use of Scor<strong>in</strong>g Functions <strong>in</strong> Drug Discovery Applications<br />

studied. From X-ray studies, it was known that the side cha<strong>in</strong> hydroxyl of Tyr<br />

82 forms a hydrogen bond with the ligand. If Tyr 82 is replaced by Phe, then<br />

one hydrogen bond is lost. As expected, the ligand-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g aff<strong>in</strong>ity was slightly<br />

reduced. The free enthalpy difference is 4 1:5 kJ/mol. Somewhat unexpectedly,<br />

however, this destabilization is due to an entropy loss. In other words,<br />

the formation of this particular hydrogen bond is enthalpically unfavorable<br />

but entropically favorable. The entropy ga<strong>in</strong> appears to be ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to<br />

the replacement of two water molecules by the ligand. 41<br />

Lipophilic <strong>in</strong>teractions are essentially contacts between apolar parts<br />

of the prote<strong>in</strong> and the ligand. The generally accepted view is that lipophilic<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions are ma<strong>in</strong>ly the result of the replacement and release of ordered<br />

water molecules and thus are entropy-driven processes. 42,43 The entropy<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> is due to the fact that the water molecules are no longer positionally conf<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

There are also enthalpic contributions to lipophilic <strong>in</strong>teractions. Water<br />

molecules occupy<strong>in</strong>g lipophilic b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sites are unable to form hydrogen<br />

bonds with the prote<strong>in</strong>. If they are released, they can form strong hydrogen<br />

bonds with bulk water. It has been shown <strong>in</strong> many cases that the lipophilic<br />

contribution to the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g aff<strong>in</strong>ity is proportional to the lipophilic surface<br />

area buried from the solvent and typically has values <strong>in</strong> the range of 80–<br />

200 J/(mol A ˚ 2 ). 44–46<br />

Conformational flexibility is another factor <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g aff<strong>in</strong>ity.<br />

Usually, a ligand b<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle conformation and therefore loses much<br />

of its conformational flexibility upon b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g. Greater b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g aff<strong>in</strong>ities have<br />

been observed for cyclic derivatives of ligands that otherwise adopt the same<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g mode. 47,48 The entropic cost of freez<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle rotatable bond has<br />

been estimated to be 1.6–3.6 kJ/mol at 300 K. 49,50 Recent estimates derived<br />

from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shift titrations of open-cha<strong>in</strong> dications<br />

and dianions are much lower (0.5 kJ/mol), 51 but <strong>in</strong> those systems the conformational<br />

restriction may not have been as high as <strong>in</strong> a prote<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site.<br />

The entropic cost of the external (translational and orientational) degrees of<br />

freedom has been estimated to be around 10 kJ/mol. 52,53<br />

In spite of many <strong>in</strong>consistencies and difficulties <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation, most of<br />

the experimental data suggests that simple additive models for the prote<strong>in</strong>–<br />

ligand <strong>in</strong>teractions might be a good start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for the development of<br />

empirical scor<strong>in</strong>g functions. Indeed, the first published scor<strong>in</strong>g functions<br />

were actually built based on experimental work that was published by about<br />

1992, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g studies on thermolys<strong>in</strong> 54 and vancomyc<strong>in</strong>. 50,55<br />

Figure 3 summarizes some of the <strong>in</strong>teractions that play a role <strong>in</strong> receptor–<br />

ligand b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g. B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves a complex equilibrium between ensembles of<br />

solvated species. In the next section, we will discuss various approaches that<br />

are used to capture essential elements of this equilibrium <strong>in</strong> computationally<br />

efficient scor<strong>in</strong>g functions. The discussion focuses on general approaches<br />

rather than <strong>in</strong>dividual functions. The reader is referred to Table 1 for orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

references to the most important scor<strong>in</strong>g functions. 56–114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!