19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 The Use of Scor<strong>in</strong>g Functions <strong>in</strong> Drug Discovery Applications<br />

However, design<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle, active, synthetically accessible compound<br />

turned out to be a greater challenge than expected. It is still difficult to<br />

computationally predict <strong>in</strong>duced-fit phenomena and b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g aff<strong>in</strong>ities for<br />

new ligand candidates. But while exist<strong>in</strong>g model<strong>in</strong>g tools are certa<strong>in</strong>ly not suitable<br />

to design the one perfect drug molecule, they can help to enrich sets of<br />

molecules with greater numbers of biologically active candidates, even though<br />

the rates of false positives (and false negatives) are still high. Thus, an important<br />

current goal of molecular design is to <strong>in</strong>crease the hit rate <strong>in</strong> biological<br />

assays compared to random compound selections, which means that structure-based<br />

design approaches now focus on the process<strong>in</strong>g of large numbers<br />

of molecules. These ‘‘virtual libraries’’ of molecules can consist of either exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

molecules (e.g., the compound collection of a pharmaceutical company) or<br />

of putative novel structures that could be synthesized via comb<strong>in</strong>atorial chemistry.<br />

The computational goal is to rapidly assess millions of possible molecules<br />

by filter<strong>in</strong>g out the majority that are predicted to be extremely unlikely<br />

to b<strong>in</strong>d, and then to prioritize the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ones. This approach is, <strong>in</strong> fact, a<br />

successful strategy, and several recent publications have demonstrated<br />

impressive enrichment of active compounds. 10–15 The change of focus from<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual compounds to compound libraries has been supported by three<br />

major developments that have taken place s<strong>in</strong>ce the early days of molecular<br />

design:<br />

1. An exponentially grow<strong>in</strong>g number of 3D prote<strong>in</strong> structures is available <strong>in</strong><br />

the public doma<strong>in</strong>. Consequently, the number of projects rely<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

structural <strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>in</strong>creased, and structure-based ligand design is<br />

nowadays rout<strong>in</strong>ely carried out at all major pharmaceutical companies.<br />

The amount of structural knowledge is so large that automated methods<br />

are needed to make full use of it.<br />

2. High throughput screen<strong>in</strong>g (HTS) has become a well-established process.<br />

Large libraries of several hundred thousand compounds are rout<strong>in</strong>ely tested<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st new targets. This biological test<strong>in</strong>g can, <strong>in</strong> many cases, be carried<br />

out <strong>in</strong> less than one month.<br />

3. Synthetic chemistry has undergone a major change with the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>atorial and parallel chemistry techniques. There is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

trend to move away from the synthesis of <strong>in</strong>dividual compounds toward the<br />

synthesis of compound libraries, whose members are accessible through the<br />

same chemical reaction us<strong>in</strong>g different chemical build<strong>in</strong>g blocks.<br />

To offer a competitive advantage, structure-based design tools must now<br />

be fast enough to prioritize thousands of compounds per day. Several algorithms<br />

have been developed that allow for de novo design 16,17 or for flexible<br />

dock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>18</strong> of hundreds to thousands of small molecules <strong>in</strong>to a prote<strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

site per day on a s<strong>in</strong>gle CPU computer. Essential components of all<br />

these structure-based design software tools are scor<strong>in</strong>g functions that translate<br />

computationally determ<strong>in</strong>ed prote<strong>in</strong>–ligand <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>to approximate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!