Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

References 141
139. J. Hinze and H. H. Jaffe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 540–546 (1962). Electronegativity. I. Orbital
Electronegativity of Neutral Atoms.
140. U. Dinur, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 303, 227–237 (1994). A Relationship Between the
Molecular Polarizability, Molecular Dipole Moment and Atomic Electronegativities in AB
and ABn Molecules.
141. In Ref. 125, the hardness, J, and Jab (rab) are both characterized by a Slater exponent
parameter, . For hydrogen atoms, this parameter is taken to depend on its charge
( ¼ 0 þ qH), introducing nonlinearities in the electronegativities. However, rather than
using the Mulliken definition of w as @U
@q ; Rappé and Goddard use the expression for w from
Eq. [42] and thereby ignore the nonlinear terms. This means that the charges in this model do
not minimize the energy. This fact is not clear from Ref. 125, but it is necessary to use Eq. [42]
to reproduce their results.
142. H. Toufar, B. G. Baekelandt, G. O. A. Janssens, W. J. Mortier, and R. A. Schoonheydt,
J. Phys. Chem., 99, 13876–13885 (1995). Investigation of Supramolecular Systems by a
Combination of the Electronegativity Equalization Method and a Monte Carlo Simulation
Technique.
143. B.-C. Perng, M. D. Newton, F. O. Raineri, and H. L. Friedman, J. Chem. Phys., 104, 7153–
7176 (1996). Energetics of Charge Transfer Reactions in Solvents of Dipolar and Higher
Order Multiplier Character. I. Theory.
144. M. J. Field, Mol. Phys., 91, 835–845 (1997). Hybrid Quantum Mechanical/Molecular
Mechanical Fluctuating Charge Models for Condensed Phase Simulations.
145. Y.-P. Liu, K. Kim, B. J. Berne, R. A. Friesner, and S. W. Rick, J. Chem. Phys., 108, 4739
(1998). Constructing Ab Initio Force Fields for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
146. J. L. Banks, G. A. Kaminski, R. Zhou, D. T. Mainz, B. J. Berne, and R. A. Friesner, J. Chem.
Phys., 110, 741–754 (1999). Parametrizing a Polarizable Force Field from Ab Initio Data. I.
The Fluctuating Point Charge Model.
147. B. Chen, J. Xing, and J. I. Siepmann, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 2391–2401 (2000). Development
of Polarizable Water Force Fields for Phase Equilibria Calculations.
148. M. C. C. Ribeiro and L. C. J. Almeida, J. Chem. Phys., 110, 11445–11448 (1999). Fluctuating
Charge Model for Polyatomic Ionic Systems: A Test Case with Diatomic Anions.
149. R. Chelli, P. Procacci, R. Righini, and S. Califano, J. Chem. Phys., 111, 8569–8575 (1999).
Electrical Response in Chemical Potential Equilization Schemes.
150. H. A. Stern, G. A. Kaminski, J. L. Banks, R. Zhou, B. J. Berne, and R. A. Friesner, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 103, 4730–4737 (1999). Fluctuating Charge, Polarizable Dipole, and Combined
Models: Parameterization from Ab Initio Quantum Chemistry.
151. K. Kitaura and K. Morokuma, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 10, 325–340 (1976). A New Energy
Decomposition Scheme for Molecular Interactions within the Hartee–Fock Approximation.
152. F. Weinhold, J. Mol. Struct., 399, 181–197 (1997). Nature of H-Bonding in Clusters, Liquids,
and Enzymes: An Ab Initio, Natural Bond Orbital Perspective.
153. A. van der Vaart and K. M. Merz Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 9182–9190 (1999). The Role of
Polarization and Charge Transfer in the Solvation of Biomolecules.
154. J. Korchowiec and T. Uchimaru, J. Chem. Phys., 112, 1623–1633 (2000). New Energy
Partitioning Scheme Based on the Self-Consistent Charge and Configuration Method for
Subsystems: Application to Water Dimer System.
155. J. P. Perdew, R. G. Parr, M. Levy, and J. L. Balduz Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 1691–1694 (1982).
Density-Functional Theory for Fractional Particle Number: Derivative Discontinuities of the
Energy.
156. R. Car and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 2471–2474 (1985). Unified Approuch for
Molecular Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory.
157. J. Morales and T. J. Martinez, J. Chem. Phys., 105, 2842–2850 (2001). Classical Fluctuating
Charge Theories: An Entropy Valence Bond Formalism and Relationships to Previous
Models.