Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 Charge-Transfer Reactions <strong>in</strong> Condensed Phases<br />
that leads to Eq. [24] provided the <strong>in</strong>tegrals over the segments ð i 1;<br />
i þ1Þ and ð 1; þ1Þ are equal. This happens when G1ðx; XÞ is analytic<br />
<strong>in</strong> x <strong>in</strong>side the closed contour with the two segments as its boundaries. The<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ear relation between F2ðXÞ and F1ðXÞ breaks down when the generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
function is not analytic <strong>in</strong>side this contour.<br />
Two-State Model<br />
The two-state model (TSM) provides a very basic description of quantum<br />
transitions <strong>in</strong> condensed-phase media. It limits the manifold of the electronic<br />
states of the donor–acceptor complex to only two states participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
the transition. In this section, the TSM will be explored analytically <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to reveal several important properties of ET and CT reactions. The gas-phase<br />
Hamiltonian of the TSM reads<br />
H0 ¼ X<br />
Iia þ i ai þ Hab a þ a ab þ a þ<br />
b aa<br />
½26Š<br />
i ¼ a;b<br />
where Ii are diagonal gas-phase energies, and Hab is the off-diagonal Hamiltonian<br />
matrix element usually called the ET matrix element. 7 In Eq. [26], aþ i , ai<br />
are the fermionic creation and annihilation operators <strong>in</strong> the states i ¼ a; b.<br />
The Hamiltonian <strong>in</strong> Eq. [26] is usually referred to as the diabatic representation,<br />
employ<strong>in</strong>g the diabatic basis set ffa; fbg <strong>in</strong> which the Hamiltonian<br />
matrix is not diagonal. There is, of course, no unique diabatic basis as any pair<br />
f ~ fa; ~ fbg obta<strong>in</strong>ed from ffa; fbg by a unitary transformation can def<strong>in</strong>e a new<br />
basis. A unitary transformation def<strong>in</strong>es a l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation of fa and fb which, for a two-state system, can be represented as a rotation of the<br />
ffa; fbg basis on the angle c<br />
~f a ¼ cos cf a þ s<strong>in</strong> cf b<br />
~f a ¼ s<strong>in</strong> cf a þ cos cf b<br />
One such rotation is usually s<strong>in</strong>gled out. A unitary transformation ffa; fbg! ff1; f2g diagonaliz<strong>in</strong>g the Hamiltonian matrix<br />
H0 ¼ X<br />
½28Š<br />
i¼1;2<br />
Eia þ i ai<br />
generates the adiabatic basis set ff 1; f 2g. The adiabatic gas-phase energies are<br />
then given as<br />
Ei ¼ 1<br />
2 ðIa þ I bÞ<br />
1<br />
2<br />
½27Š<br />
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />
ðIb IaÞ 2 þ 4H2 q<br />
ab;<br />
E12 ¼ E2 E1 ½29Š