19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 Charge-Transfer Reactions <strong>in</strong> Condensed Phases<br />

that leads to Eq. [24] provided the <strong>in</strong>tegrals over the segments ð i 1;<br />

i þ1Þ and ð 1; þ1Þ are equal. This happens when G1ðx; XÞ is analytic<br />

<strong>in</strong> x <strong>in</strong>side the closed contour with the two segments as its boundaries. The<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear relation between F2ðXÞ and F1ðXÞ breaks down when the generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

function is not analytic <strong>in</strong>side this contour.<br />

Two-State Model<br />

The two-state model (TSM) provides a very basic description of quantum<br />

transitions <strong>in</strong> condensed-phase media. It limits the manifold of the electronic<br />

states of the donor–acceptor complex to only two states participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the transition. In this section, the TSM will be explored analytically <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to reveal several important properties of ET and CT reactions. The gas-phase<br />

Hamiltonian of the TSM reads<br />

H0 ¼ X<br />

Iia þ i ai þ Hab a þ a ab þ a þ<br />

b aa<br />

½26Š<br />

i ¼ a;b<br />

where Ii are diagonal gas-phase energies, and Hab is the off-diagonal Hamiltonian<br />

matrix element usually called the ET matrix element. 7 In Eq. [26], aþ i , ai<br />

are the fermionic creation and annihilation operators <strong>in</strong> the states i ¼ a; b.<br />

The Hamiltonian <strong>in</strong> Eq. [26] is usually referred to as the diabatic representation,<br />

employ<strong>in</strong>g the diabatic basis set ffa; fbg <strong>in</strong> which the Hamiltonian<br />

matrix is not diagonal. There is, of course, no unique diabatic basis as any pair<br />

f ~ fa; ~ fbg obta<strong>in</strong>ed from ffa; fbg by a unitary transformation can def<strong>in</strong>e a new<br />

basis. A unitary transformation def<strong>in</strong>es a l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation of fa and fb which, for a two-state system, can be represented as a rotation of the<br />

ffa; fbg basis on the angle c<br />

~f a ¼ cos cf a þ s<strong>in</strong> cf b<br />

~f a ¼ s<strong>in</strong> cf a þ cos cf b<br />

One such rotation is usually s<strong>in</strong>gled out. A unitary transformation ffa; fbg! ff1; f2g diagonaliz<strong>in</strong>g the Hamiltonian matrix<br />

H0 ¼ X<br />

½28Š<br />

i¼1;2<br />

Eia þ i ai<br />

generates the adiabatic basis set ff 1; f 2g. The adiabatic gas-phase energies are<br />

then given as<br />

Ei ¼ 1<br />

2 ðIa þ I bÞ<br />

1<br />

2<br />

½27Š<br />

ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi<br />

ðIb IaÞ 2 þ 4H2 q<br />

ab;<br />

E12 ¼ E2 E1 ½29Š

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!