19.02.2013 Views

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

178 Charge-Transfer Reactions <strong>in</strong> Condensed Phases<br />

The parameter fei is def<strong>in</strong>ed by Eq. [90]. It scales the solute dipole moment and<br />

the polarizability yield<strong>in</strong>g the effective difference values<br />

The parameter<br />

~m0 ¼ fe2m02 fe1m01 ~a0 ¼ fe2a02 fe1a01 ½93Š<br />

fi ¼ ½12a a0iŠ<br />

1<br />

represents the self-consistent reaction field of the solvent <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both the<br />

electronic and nuclear polarization components; a ¼ ae þ ap, where ae is the<br />

solvent response coefficient of the solvent electronic polarization. The electronic<br />

and total solvent response coefficients can be evaluated from the dielectric<br />

cavity or explicit solvent models. 5,71,72 The dielectric cont<strong>in</strong>uum estimate<br />

for a spherical solute yields<br />

ae ¼ 1<br />

R 3 0<br />

E1 1<br />

2E1 þ 1<br />

a ¼ 1<br />

R 3 0<br />

Es 1<br />

2Es þ 1<br />

where E1 and Es are the high frequency and static dielectric constants of the<br />

solvent. When the solute polarizability is constant, the reorganization energy<br />

is the same <strong>in</strong> both reaction states ð f ¼ f1 ¼ f2; fe ¼ fe1 ¼ fe2Þ and is given by<br />

the well-known relation 73<br />

½94Š<br />

½95Š<br />

l ¼ ðaf ae feÞ<br />

m 2 0 ½96Š<br />

A polarizability change leads to a significant variation of the reorganization<br />

energy, which is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 8, where li are plotted aga<strong>in</strong>st a02.<br />

As can be seen, the reorganization energy approximately doubles with excitation<br />

when the excited-state polarizability is about 50% higher than the<br />

ground-state value. Such polarizability differences are not uncommon for optical<br />

chromophores (Table 2). The effect of the negative polarizability variation<br />

is much weaker, and l2 is only slightly smaller than l1.<br />

From the Q model, the solvent-<strong>in</strong>duced shift of the equilibrium free<br />

energy gap F0i ¼ Ii þ Fs;i is given by the follow<strong>in</strong>g relation:<br />

Fs;i ¼ 2apfi ~m0 m0i þ apfi ~a0 m 2 0i ½97Š<br />

Also, the solvent-<strong>in</strong>duced Stokes shift between the absorption and emission<br />

first spectral moments is<br />

h nst ¼ hn abs hnem<br />

¼ 2ap ~m0 ½f2m02 f1m01Šþ2a 2 p<br />

~a0½ðf2m02Þ 2<br />

ðf1m01Þ 2 Š ½98Š

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!