Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
Reviews in Computational Chemistry Volume 18
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
60 The Use of Scor<strong>in</strong>g Functions <strong>in</strong> Drug Discovery Applications<br />
between what is not observed and what is to be expected on average is often<br />
not significant enough to form reliable repulsive <strong>in</strong>teractions. Furthermore, the<br />
neglect of angular terms <strong>in</strong> the derivation of knowledge-based scor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
functions leads to average pair potentials that cannot discrim<strong>in</strong>ate well enough<br />
between different b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g geometries.<br />
In the derivation of regression-based empirical scor<strong>in</strong>g schemes, on the<br />
other hand, penalty terms have traditionally not been <strong>in</strong>cluded. However,<br />
some situations like obvious electrostatic and steric clashes can be avoided<br />
by guess<strong>in</strong>g reasonable penalty terms or by import<strong>in</strong>g them from molecular<br />
mechanics force fields. An example of this is the ‘‘chemical scor<strong>in</strong>g’’ function<br />
available <strong>in</strong> the dock<strong>in</strong>g program DOCK. 94–99 This function is a modified van<br />
der Waals potential made to be attractive or repulsive between particular<br />
groups of donor, acceptor, and lipophilic receptor atoms and ligand<br />
atoms. 169,170 Other unacceptable b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g orientations cannot be avoided by<br />
simple clash terms, but <strong>in</strong>stead require a more ref<strong>in</strong>ed analysis of b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g geometry.<br />
Among the causes for poor results are an imperfect steric fit ofthe<br />
ligand with<strong>in</strong> the cavity, an unnaturally high degree of solvent-accessible<br />
ligand surface <strong>in</strong> the complex or the formation of voids at the receptor–ligand<br />
<strong>in</strong>terface. Possible remedies are empirical filters that measure such fit parameters<br />
and remove dock<strong>in</strong>g solutions above a user-specified threshold. 171 A<br />
promis<strong>in</strong>g approach along these l<strong>in</strong>es is the <strong>in</strong>clusion of artificially generated,<br />
erroneous, decoy solutions <strong>in</strong> the optimization of scor<strong>in</strong>g functions. In the process<br />
of deriv<strong>in</strong>g weights for <strong>in</strong>dividual terms of the scor<strong>in</strong>g function, the decoy<br />
solutions should always obta<strong>in</strong> lower ranks than the correct solutions, and<br />
thus suitable penalty terms could be derived automatically. Such a procedure<br />
was first reported for the scor<strong>in</strong>g function of a flexible ligand superposition<br />
algorithm. 172,173<br />
Specific Attractive Interactions<br />
Another general deficiency of scor<strong>in</strong>g functions stems from the simplified<br />
description of attractive <strong>in</strong>teractions. Molecular recognition is not based only<br />
on classical hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts. Many researchers,<br />
especially those active <strong>in</strong> host–guest chemistry, are mak<strong>in</strong>g use of other specific<br />
types of <strong>in</strong>teractions. For example, hydrogen bonds that are formed between<br />
acidic protons and p systems. 174 These bonds can substitute for conventional<br />
hydrogen bonds <strong>in</strong> both strength and specificity, as has been noted, for example,<br />
<strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>–DNA recognition 175 and as can be observed <strong>in</strong> ser<strong>in</strong>e protease<br />
complexes deposited <strong>in</strong> the PDB. 161 Another class of ‘‘unconventional’’ <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
is the cation–p <strong>in</strong>teraction, which is especially important at the surface<br />
of prote<strong>in</strong>s. 176,177 Current empirical scor<strong>in</strong>g functions do not model these<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions and mostly disregard the directionality of, for example, <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
between aromatic r<strong>in</strong>gs. 178,179 In the derivation of empirical scor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
functions, one thus implicitly attributes some of the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy aris<strong>in</strong>g