ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano
ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano
ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANDREW J.e. COLLISON<br />
Simulating the development of preferential flow paths<br />
and gully head collapse using plastic<br />
deformation-hydrology-stability modelling<br />
Department of Geography, King's College London,<br />
Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK<br />
Much research has highlighted the importance of preferential<br />
flow processes in the development of gullies by headcollapses.<br />
In addition to piping, recent studies have shown<br />
how preferential flow can be caused by water accumulation<br />
in tension tracks. This paper investigates marl gullies<br />
in South East Spain using a combined hydrology-slope St3.""<br />
bility model to demonstrate how Water flow in tension<br />
cracks can trigger head-collapse, and a finite element<br />
deformation model to show how such cracks can develop<br />
in new gully heads by the processes of plastic deformation.<br />
The results suggest that slope undercutting leads the marl<br />
to deform plastically, introducing tension cracks. These are<br />
then exploited as preferential flow paths by overland flow<br />
and throughflow, resulting in the development of positive<br />
pressures at the gully head. These reduce gully head stability<br />
by two processes. Firstly, loss off suction at the gully<br />
head can initiate failure by slumping or toppling. Secondly,<br />
throughflow velocities are raised by an order of magnitude,<br />
favouring the development of suffosion and piping. This<br />
composite model pulls together many hitherto neglected<br />
processes in gully head development and provides an alternative<br />
mechanism to the conventional view of head retreat<br />
by runoff and erosion.<br />
ANDREW J.C. COLLISON\ MARTIN DEHN 2<br />
,<br />
STEVEN.. _.D. WADE 1 & JAMES GRIFFITHS 1<br />
Managing climate change impacts on landsliding .. using<br />
a combined hydrology-stability model to assess<br />
the relative sensitivity of a landslide to climatic versus<br />
landuse change in South East England<br />
1 Department of Geography,<br />
King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK<br />
2 Geographische Institute der Universitat Bonn,<br />
Meckenheimer AIle 166, D-53115 Bonn, Germany<br />
Much recent research has focused on the sensmvity of<br />
landslides to changes in climate associated with global warming.<br />
Climate change predictions for the SE of England<br />
suggest that whilst mean rainfall will persist at current levels,<br />
the distribution will be more uneven than at present,<br />
resulting in more landslide activity. However, these climatic<br />
changes have to be considered in the context of widespread<br />
changes in European landuse associated with set-<br />
aside and re-afforestation. This paper uses a combined hydrology<br />
and stability model to evaluate the relative significanee<br />
of climate change predicted from downscaled Gcm<br />
outputs, compared with changes in hydrological regime associated<br />
with landuse shifts for a landslide complex in SE<br />
England. The results suggest that whilst climate change has<br />
the potential to increase landslide activity, this trend is relatively<br />
insignificant when compared with changes in available<br />
moisture due to vegetation cover conversion and agricultural<br />
drainage. The results highlight the scope for managing<br />
landslides by changing landuse, and offer a potential<br />
methodology for assessing alternative landslide management<br />
strategies.<br />
MAURO COLTORTI<br />
Superimposition, river captures and the Plio-Pleistocene<br />
evolution of the Umbria-Marche area (Central Italy)<br />
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, via delle Cerchia 3, Siena, Italy<br />
A «planation surface» preserved on the _Apennine ridge<br />
constitutes the starting point for the evolution of the drainage<br />
network in Central Italy. Its modelling has been associated<br />
to the subaereal erosion which occurred after the<br />
Messinian and possibly until the Lower Pliocene transgression.<br />
In the Middle Pliocene, and possibly until Upper<br />
Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene, a downwarping movement affected<br />
the Tiber as well as the Periadriatic areas which became<br />
basins while upwarping affected the Umbria-Marche<br />
and the Amelia Ridges. The Umbria-Marche Ridge was delimitated,<br />
to the east, by the Sibillini-Urbino thrust front<br />
and, to the west, by a flexure located in correspondence to<br />
the actual graben of the East Tiber valley. Many wide valleys<br />
were formed after the emersion and followed E-W Jurassic<br />
fractures which were locally reactivated during the<br />
thrusting. There were also Apennine valleys originated<br />
from the selective erosion of the softer Oligo-Miocene terrains<br />
which separate a thrust sheet from another. Until the<br />
Lower Pleistocene, a low energy landscape evolved with<br />
large valleys which were separated by hills with many planated<br />
remnants still preserved on their top and a not very<br />
well recognizeable watershed. The eastern side of the depressions<br />
were fed by alluvial fan and fan deltas. In fact,<br />
geomorphic evidence testifies that the main thrust front<br />
(i.e, Sibillini, Martani, etc) were locally reactivated by reverse<br />
faults. Both basins sunk well below sea level. The Peri-Adriatic<br />
basin was filled with marine deposits, while the<br />
Tiber Basin, separated from the sea by the Amelia Mountains,<br />
underwent fluvial, fluvio-Iacustrine and alluvial fan<br />
sedimentation.<br />
At the end of the Lower Pleistocene the uplifting became<br />
more generalized and affected the whole of Central Italy,<br />
although higher values were concentrated along the chain<br />
axe. The down cutting rates increased and were locally<br />
125