23.03.2013 Views

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANDREW J.e. COLLISON<br />

Simulating the development of preferential flow paths<br />

and gully head collapse using plastic<br />

deformation-hydrology-stability modelling<br />

Department of Geography, King's College London,<br />

Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK<br />

Much research has highlighted the importance of preferential<br />

flow processes in the development of gullies by headcollapses.<br />

In addition to piping, recent studies have shown<br />

how preferential flow can be caused by water accumulation<br />

in tension tracks. This paper investigates marl gullies<br />

in South East Spain using a combined hydrology-slope St3.""<br />

bility model to demonstrate how Water flow in tension<br />

cracks can trigger head-collapse, and a finite element<br />

deformation model to show how such cracks can develop<br />

in new gully heads by the processes of plastic deformation.<br />

The results suggest that slope undercutting leads the marl<br />

to deform plastically, introducing tension cracks. These are<br />

then exploited as preferential flow paths by overland flow<br />

and throughflow, resulting in the development of positive<br />

pressures at the gully head. These reduce gully head stability<br />

by two processes. Firstly, loss off suction at the gully<br />

head can initiate failure by slumping or toppling. Secondly,<br />

throughflow velocities are raised by an order of magnitude,<br />

favouring the development of suffosion and piping. This<br />

composite model pulls together many hitherto neglected<br />

processes in gully head development and provides an alternative<br />

mechanism to the conventional view of head retreat<br />

by runoff and erosion.<br />

ANDREW J.C. COLLISON\ MARTIN DEHN 2<br />

,<br />

STEVEN.. _.D. WADE 1 & JAMES GRIFFITHS 1<br />

Managing climate change impacts on landsliding .. using<br />

a combined hydrology-stability model to assess<br />

the relative sensitivity of a landslide to climatic versus<br />

landuse change in South East England<br />

1 Department of Geography,<br />

King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK<br />

2 Geographische Institute der Universitat Bonn,<br />

Meckenheimer AIle 166, D-53115 Bonn, Germany<br />

Much recent research has focused on the sensmvity of<br />

landslides to changes in climate associated with global warming.<br />

Climate change predictions for the SE of England<br />

suggest that whilst mean rainfall will persist at current levels,<br />

the distribution will be more uneven than at present,<br />

resulting in more landslide activity. However, these climatic<br />

changes have to be considered in the context of widespread<br />

changes in European landuse associated with set-<br />

aside and re-afforestation. This paper uses a combined hydrology<br />

and stability model to evaluate the relative significanee<br />

of climate change predicted from downscaled Gcm<br />

outputs, compared with changes in hydrological regime associated<br />

with landuse shifts for a landslide complex in SE<br />

England. The results suggest that whilst climate change has<br />

the potential to increase landslide activity, this trend is relatively<br />

insignificant when compared with changes in available<br />

moisture due to vegetation cover conversion and agricultural<br />

drainage. The results highlight the scope for managing<br />

landslides by changing landuse, and offer a potential<br />

methodology for assessing alternative landslide management<br />

strategies.<br />

MAURO COLTORTI<br />

Superimposition, river captures and the Plio-Pleistocene<br />

evolution of the Umbria-Marche area (Central Italy)<br />

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, via delle Cerchia 3, Siena, Italy<br />

A «planation surface» preserved on the _Apennine ridge<br />

constitutes the starting point for the evolution of the drainage<br />

network in Central Italy. Its modelling has been associated<br />

to the subaereal erosion which occurred after the<br />

Messinian and possibly until the Lower Pliocene transgression.<br />

In the Middle Pliocene, and possibly until Upper<br />

Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene, a downwarping movement affected<br />

the Tiber as well as the Periadriatic areas which became<br />

basins while upwarping affected the Umbria-Marche<br />

and the Amelia Ridges. The Umbria-Marche Ridge was delimitated,<br />

to the east, by the Sibillini-Urbino thrust front<br />

and, to the west, by a flexure located in correspondence to<br />

the actual graben of the East Tiber valley. Many wide valleys<br />

were formed after the emersion and followed E-W Jurassic<br />

fractures which were locally reactivated during the<br />

thrusting. There were also Apennine valleys originated<br />

from the selective erosion of the softer Oligo-Miocene terrains<br />

which separate a thrust sheet from another. Until the<br />

Lower Pleistocene, a low energy landscape evolved with<br />

large valleys which were separated by hills with many planated<br />

remnants still preserved on their top and a not very<br />

well recognizeable watershed. The eastern side of the depressions<br />

were fed by alluvial fan and fan deltas. In fact,<br />

geomorphic evidence testifies that the main thrust front<br />

(i.e, Sibillini, Martani, etc) were locally reactivated by reverse<br />

faults. Both basins sunk well below sea level. The Peri-Adriatic<br />

basin was filled with marine deposits, while the<br />

Tiber Basin, separated from the sea by the Amelia Mountains,<br />

underwent fluvial, fluvio-Iacustrine and alluvial fan<br />

sedimentation.<br />

At the end of the Lower Pleistocene the uplifting became<br />

more generalized and affected the whole of Central Italy,<br />

although higher values were concentrated along the chain<br />

axe. The down cutting rates increased and were locally<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!