23.03.2013 Views

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

een drawn by photogrammetry, From the image the reader<br />

can argue the characteristics of the ground (bare rock,<br />

debris, snowfields, ice, water,...). The symbols are grouped<br />

and classified in colour classes according to the main geomorphic<br />

processes. They were mapped using both photoand<br />

satellite image- interpretation and prolonged field surveys<br />

carried out during antarctic expeditions since 1985.<br />

CARLO BARONI 1, GIUSEPPE BRUSCHI 1<br />

& JERONIMO L6PEZ-MARTINEZ 2<br />

Antarctic geomorphological maps<br />

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Pisa,<br />

via S. Maria 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy<br />

2 Departamento de Geologia, Facultad de Ciencias,<br />

Universidad Aut6noma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain<br />

The geomorphological maps and the geomorphological<br />

sketches related to the Antarctic territory have been collected<br />

and analysed. Of 271 geomorphological cartographic<br />

documents only ten can be classified as geomorphological<br />

maps sensu stricto (r.r.), On the basis of the graphical representation<br />

adopted and of the importance given to origin<br />

of landforms, morphograpy and lithology, the geomorphological<br />

maps s.s. were grouped as follows:<br />

- morphostructural small scale maps that picture the whole<br />

Antarctic continent (1 document);<br />

- morphogenetic-morphodinamic maps that depict the<br />

most important landscape components differentiated with<br />

colours on the basis of different morphogenetic origin; active<br />

and relict landforms are also distinguished and chronological<br />

information are supplied where available (4 documents);<br />

- morphochronological maps that emphasized with different<br />

colours the chronology of landforms and deposits represented<br />

(2 documents);<br />

- geomorphological-morphographic maps that differentiate<br />

areas where different geomorphological processes are,<br />

or were, active; morphographic information is also supplied<br />

(3 documents).<br />

A different group of maps regard the geomorphological<br />

thematic selected maps (6 documents). They differ from<br />

the geomorphological maps s.s. because they show a limited<br />

number of geomorphological themes. Those maps are<br />

clearly produced to study one particular scientific problem<br />

(i.e. glacial history).<br />

Furthermore, We have considered the detailed sketches of<br />

small size that describe the geomorphology of a certain<br />

area (30 documents). These latter, defined geomorphological<br />

sketch maps, are different from geomorphological maps<br />

due to their smaller size and the absence of well-organised<br />

topographic data (generally only spot heights are indi-<br />

68<br />

cared). Finally, 225 thematic sketches and location maps<br />

with geomorphological information have been analysed.<br />

The structure of the Antarctic geomorphological maps is<br />

highly discordant: the discrepancies mainly lay in the definition<br />

of legends, due to a different importance given to<br />

the morphogenetic processes, the structural characteristics<br />

of investigated area and to the chronology of the events.<br />

These differences reflect the points of view of various geomorphological<br />

schools, and are also a function of scale of<br />

representation and local characteristics of the areas surveyed.<br />

Of the ten geomorphological maps s.s. analysed (scale variable<br />

from 1:20,000 to 1.15,000,000), five regard East Antarctica,<br />

two West Antarctica, two the Subantarctic Island<br />

of South Georgia and one includes almost the whole continent.<br />

Excluding this last map, the others cover 17,686<br />

km',<br />

Interest in the production of geomorphological maps has<br />

recently grown testifying to the important role that the<br />

geomorphological cartography has in Antarctica, both as<br />

a method of basic research, as a method of representation<br />

and analysis of the landscape, as a support for other<br />

research, and as base documents integrated in systems of<br />

geographical information (Gis). A deeper confrontation<br />

between the researchers working on Antarctic geomorphology<br />

is therefore necessary for convenience in<br />

utilizing comparable if not compatible and integrated<br />

legends.<br />

CARLO BARONI 1 & ALBERTO CARTON 2<br />

The AdameIIo Group (Central Alps, Italy):<br />

geomorphological map and Holocene glacier variations<br />

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Pisa,<br />

via S. Maria 53,56100 Pisa, Italy<br />

2 Dipartirnento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Torino,<br />

via Accademia delle Scienze 5, 10125 Torino, Italy<br />

The 1:50,000 geomorphological map of the Adamello massif<br />

prepared in accordance with the guidelines for such<br />

maps elaborated by the Italian National Geological Service<br />

in 1994 is presented. It was originally drawn to the<br />

1:10,000 scale and summarises the results of investisations<br />

carried by the writers over the last ten years (Baroni &<br />

Carton, 1987, 1990, 1991a, 1991b, 1992 and 1996, in<br />

press; Baroni & alii, 1993). The glaciological data collected<br />

during the surveying work have resulted in a very detailed<br />

representation of the changes that have taken place in most<br />

of the local glaciers. Exact mapping of the present glaciers<br />

and application of the accumlulation/total area ratio<br />

method have enabled their equilibrium line altitude to be<br />

compared with that for the Little Ice Age, as reonstyructed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!