ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano
ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano
ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANNALISA AMATO<br />
Estimating Pleistocene tectonic uplift rates in the<br />
South-Eastern Apennines (Italy)<br />
from erosional landsurfaces and marine terraces<br />
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Napoli<br />
Federico II, largo S. Marcellino, 80138 Napoli, Italy<br />
The Southern Apennines are part of an arc-shaped Eastverging<br />
thrust system whose activity occurred mainly<br />
between Late Miocene and Early Pleistocene and whose<br />
last phases of thrusting are well recorded along the outer<br />
front of the chain. In this paper a tentative reconstruction<br />
of the Southeastern Apennines tectonic uplift during Pleistocene<br />
time is made using two main sets of data. Those regarding<br />
the Early Pleistocene time interval refer to the<br />
erosionallandsurfaces that were cut on thrusts and imbricates<br />
of the chain front and were uplifted during the very<br />
last phases of compression. The second group of data<br />
come from a stair of ten orders of Middle to Late Pleistocene<br />
marine terraces cut on both the deformed units of<br />
the chain and the uplifted sedimentary infilling of the last<br />
foredeep. This second set of data accounts with more detail<br />
for the vertical movements occurred after the end of<br />
thrusting.<br />
By analysing their spatial and altimetric distribution and<br />
their relationships with Pleistocene piggy-back basin sediments,<br />
the erosionallandsurfaces relics have been ascribed<br />
to two main generations modelled during the middle and<br />
the late parts of Early Pleistocene, respectively.<br />
The flight of marine terraces analysed here is up to 450 m<br />
a.s.l. high and covers a period starting from the beginning<br />
of the Middle Pleistocene untill the end of the Late Pleistocene.<br />
The terraces are not regularly distributed since<br />
their number, extension, and elevation vary from place to<br />
place. In particular, proceeding from North to South (i.e,<br />
from the outer foredeep toward the chain) the terraces increase<br />
in number and become narrower, while the intervening<br />
scarps become higher and steeper. The correlations<br />
among terraces of different sections are based upon three<br />
marker terraces, which are well preserved and almost continuous<br />
along the whole coastal segment. Chronological<br />
data as well as correlations with glacio-eustatic highstands<br />
suggested by the oxygen-isotopic record are used to infer<br />
the age of each order of marine terraces, while the elevation<br />
data refer to the inner edge of each abrasion platform.<br />
The chronological and altimetrical data sets regarding both<br />
erosionallandsurfaces and marine terraces have been plotted<br />
on time-elevation diagrams. Then, the derivative of<br />
these curves are calculated in order to analyse how the<br />
uplift rates vary during the Pleistocene. From this analysis<br />
it emerges that at the time scale of the whole Pleistocene a<br />
generally increasing trend of the uplift rate occurs, which<br />
can be estimated in about 0.25 mm/a.<br />
Beyond this basic long term tendency, a more variable tectonic<br />
behaviour can be noted at least in the Middle and<br />
Late Pleistocene times. For this span of time, in fact, the<br />
50<br />
more numerous available data allows to appreciate fluctuations<br />
of the uplift rate between the two limit values of 0.55<br />
mm/a around 0.500 Ma, and 0.92 mm/a around 0.125 Ma.<br />
Furthermore, during this period the uplift rates are sistematically<br />
higher on the chain than on the foredeep. However,<br />
this tendency seems to stop at 0.055 Ma, since the marine<br />
terrace related to the isotopic stage 3.3 stands at the<br />
constant elevation of 20 m a.s.l. along the whole coastal<br />
sector here considered.<br />
ANNALISA AMATO & NICOLETTA SANTANGELO<br />
Watershed migration in the Southern Apennines Chain:<br />
tectonic-erosion interactions in recent orogen<br />
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Napoli Federico II,<br />
largo S. Marcellino 10, 80138 Napoli, Italy<br />
The Southern Apenines Chain is an asymmetric wedge that<br />
accreted onto a NE-wards retreating subduction slab (roll<br />
back of the Apulia foreland) between about 14 and 1 Ma.<br />
While the chain was accreting and migrating a back arc basin<br />
(seat of the present Tyrrhenian sea) opened gradually<br />
to the SW side of the wedge. As a consequence of this evolution<br />
the chain discloses an asymmetrical cross profile<br />
with a steep southwestern slope which carries evidences of<br />
the youngest phases of back-rifting, and a northeastern slope<br />
that, on the contrary, appears more gentle and dominated<br />
by features of compressive tectonics.<br />
Due to the young age of the orogenic events, the hydrographic<br />
network of the Southern Apennines still retains some<br />
characters that permit to reconstruct how the tectonic<br />
history of the wedge influenced the evolution of its drainage<br />
system. The main peculiarity of the river network of the<br />
Southern Apennines are: 1) an asymmetric development of<br />
the drainage in the opposite slopes of the chain; 2) the widespread<br />
presence of superimposed gorges in the western<br />
side and of antecedent gorges in the eastern side; 3) the<br />
concentration of the main intramontane pleistocene lacustrine<br />
basin in the western slope too; 4) a decoupling of the<br />
main watershed from the ideal highest summit line which<br />
rests many kilometers to the SW of the watershed.<br />
A large scale analysis of the areal and altimetrical distributions<br />
of erosional landsurfaces of different ages, coupled<br />
with data related to the geomorphological evolution of the<br />
main rivers valleys, allowed to recognize that the main watershed<br />
has been migrating eastwards during Pliocene<br />
Quaternary times. This migration is the consequence of several<br />
factors which help the tyrrhenian rivers capture the<br />
adriatic ones and progressively cause the main watershed<br />
to shift towards the East. The main important among them<br />
are: i) the progressive emersion of the chain; ii) the asymmetric<br />
cross-profile of the chain; iii) the increase of the<br />
longitudinal gradient of the tyrrhenian rivers caused by the<br />
rifting of the back-arc basin; iiii) the strong subsidence of