23.03.2013 Views

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANNALISA AMATO<br />

Estimating Pleistocene tectonic uplift rates in the<br />

South-Eastern Apennines (Italy)<br />

from erosional landsurfaces and marine terraces<br />

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Napoli<br />

Federico II, largo S. Marcellino, 80138 Napoli, Italy<br />

The Southern Apennines are part of an arc-shaped Eastverging<br />

thrust system whose activity occurred mainly<br />

between Late Miocene and Early Pleistocene and whose<br />

last phases of thrusting are well recorded along the outer<br />

front of the chain. In this paper a tentative reconstruction<br />

of the Southeastern Apennines tectonic uplift during Pleistocene<br />

time is made using two main sets of data. Those regarding<br />

the Early Pleistocene time interval refer to the<br />

erosionallandsurfaces that were cut on thrusts and imbricates<br />

of the chain front and were uplifted during the very<br />

last phases of compression. The second group of data<br />

come from a stair of ten orders of Middle to Late Pleistocene<br />

marine terraces cut on both the deformed units of<br />

the chain and the uplifted sedimentary infilling of the last<br />

foredeep. This second set of data accounts with more detail<br />

for the vertical movements occurred after the end of<br />

thrusting.<br />

By analysing their spatial and altimetric distribution and<br />

their relationships with Pleistocene piggy-back basin sediments,<br />

the erosionallandsurfaces relics have been ascribed<br />

to two main generations modelled during the middle and<br />

the late parts of Early Pleistocene, respectively.<br />

The flight of marine terraces analysed here is up to 450 m<br />

a.s.l. high and covers a period starting from the beginning<br />

of the Middle Pleistocene untill the end of the Late Pleistocene.<br />

The terraces are not regularly distributed since<br />

their number, extension, and elevation vary from place to<br />

place. In particular, proceeding from North to South (i.e,<br />

from the outer foredeep toward the chain) the terraces increase<br />

in number and become narrower, while the intervening<br />

scarps become higher and steeper. The correlations<br />

among terraces of different sections are based upon three<br />

marker terraces, which are well preserved and almost continuous<br />

along the whole coastal segment. Chronological<br />

data as well as correlations with glacio-eustatic highstands<br />

suggested by the oxygen-isotopic record are used to infer<br />

the age of each order of marine terraces, while the elevation<br />

data refer to the inner edge of each abrasion platform.<br />

The chronological and altimetrical data sets regarding both<br />

erosionallandsurfaces and marine terraces have been plotted<br />

on time-elevation diagrams. Then, the derivative of<br />

these curves are calculated in order to analyse how the<br />

uplift rates vary during the Pleistocene. From this analysis<br />

it emerges that at the time scale of the whole Pleistocene a<br />

generally increasing trend of the uplift rate occurs, which<br />

can be estimated in about 0.25 mm/a.<br />

Beyond this basic long term tendency, a more variable tectonic<br />

behaviour can be noted at least in the Middle and<br />

Late Pleistocene times. For this span of time, in fact, the<br />

50<br />

more numerous available data allows to appreciate fluctuations<br />

of the uplift rate between the two limit values of 0.55<br />

mm/a around 0.500 Ma, and 0.92 mm/a around 0.125 Ma.<br />

Furthermore, during this period the uplift rates are sistematically<br />

higher on the chain than on the foredeep. However,<br />

this tendency seems to stop at 0.055 Ma, since the marine<br />

terrace related to the isotopic stage 3.3 stands at the<br />

constant elevation of 20 m a.s.l. along the whole coastal<br />

sector here considered.<br />

ANNALISA AMATO & NICOLETTA SANTANGELO<br />

Watershed migration in the Southern Apennines Chain:<br />

tectonic-erosion interactions in recent orogen<br />

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Napoli Federico II,<br />

largo S. Marcellino 10, 80138 Napoli, Italy<br />

The Southern Apenines Chain is an asymmetric wedge that<br />

accreted onto a NE-wards retreating subduction slab (roll<br />

back of the Apulia foreland) between about 14 and 1 Ma.<br />

While the chain was accreting and migrating a back arc basin<br />

(seat of the present Tyrrhenian sea) opened gradually<br />

to the SW side of the wedge. As a consequence of this evolution<br />

the chain discloses an asymmetrical cross profile<br />

with a steep southwestern slope which carries evidences of<br />

the youngest phases of back-rifting, and a northeastern slope<br />

that, on the contrary, appears more gentle and dominated<br />

by features of compressive tectonics.<br />

Due to the young age of the orogenic events, the hydrographic<br />

network of the Southern Apennines still retains some<br />

characters that permit to reconstruct how the tectonic<br />

history of the wedge influenced the evolution of its drainage<br />

system. The main peculiarity of the river network of the<br />

Southern Apennines are: 1) an asymmetric development of<br />

the drainage in the opposite slopes of the chain; 2) the widespread<br />

presence of superimposed gorges in the western<br />

side and of antecedent gorges in the eastern side; 3) the<br />

concentration of the main intramontane pleistocene lacustrine<br />

basin in the western slope too; 4) a decoupling of the<br />

main watershed from the ideal highest summit line which<br />

rests many kilometers to the SW of the watershed.<br />

A large scale analysis of the areal and altimetrical distributions<br />

of erosional landsurfaces of different ages, coupled<br />

with data related to the geomorphological evolution of the<br />

main rivers valleys, allowed to recognize that the main watershed<br />

has been migrating eastwards during Pliocene­<br />

Quaternary times. This migration is the consequence of several<br />

factors which help the tyrrhenian rivers capture the<br />

adriatic ones and progressively cause the main watershed<br />

to shift towards the East. The main important among them<br />

are: i) the progressive emersion of the chain; ii) the asymmetric<br />

cross-profile of the chain; iii) the increase of the<br />

longitudinal gradient of the tyrrhenian rivers caused by the<br />

rifting of the back-arc basin; iiii) the strong subsidence of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!