23.03.2013 Views

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

ABSTRACTS / RESUMES - Comitato Glaciologico Italiano

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A «typical» deposit was chosen, and two sections were<br />

taken into account: a frontal section and a longitudinal one<br />

(figure). They showed an alternance of grain-supported<br />

and matrix-supported layers ..The sedimentological analysis<br />

of each level revealed that these deposits can be interpreted<br />

as eboulis ordonne (according to the classical French<br />

terminology). Each layer, anyway, shows its own sedimentological<br />

peculiarities, either concerning the grain size, or<br />

their orientation and dip, their sorting within the level,<br />

their relative matrix abundance, the degree of cementation,<br />

the nature of its limits. It is impossible, therefore, to<br />

account for a true cyclical nature of the layers.<br />

According to the facies of each level, in comparison with<br />

similar active deposits described in the scientific literature,<br />

an assumption is made about the processes responsable for<br />

the genesis of these deposits: they are hypothized to be<br />

congeliturbation phenomena, associated with rill episodes<br />

and grain flows. The deposits concerned are therefore<br />

likely to have formed in a typical periglacial environment,<br />

near the terminal part of a glacier snout, while this was retreating.<br />

Associated phenomena must have been an increase<br />

of rainfall, quick melting and widespread erosion.<br />

These eboulisordonne are located both above and below at<br />

least two morainic frontal ridges, dated to the Wiirm and<br />

to the Lateglacial; so their genesis was not synchronous,<br />

but formation stages of stratified slope deposits took place<br />

at different times, in different sections of the valley.<br />

()<br />

I<br />

m<br />

ISSAAK PARCHARIDIS 1, ANDREAS PAVLOPOULOS 2<br />

& MAURIZIO POSCOLIERI 3<br />

Contribution of geomorphometric analysis to a<br />

comparative volcano-tectonic study of Vulcano and<br />

Santorini islands: clues for geologic risk areas<br />

1 Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization,<br />

. 32 Xanthou str., 15451 N. Psychicon, Athens, Greece<br />

2 Laboratory of Mineralogy-Geology, Agricultural University of Athens,<br />

Iera Odos 75, GR- 11855 Athens, Greece<br />

3Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale del C.N.R., p.p. box 67,<br />

via E. Fermi 21,00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy<br />

In the southern Aegean sea there is a well known volcanic<br />

island complex represented by the Santorini (Thera), Therassia,<br />

Aspro (Aspronissi), Nea Kameni and Palea Kameni<br />

islands (fig. 1). The last two are the actual active volcanic<br />

centers; the general form of the islands and the land distribution<br />

is due to the outstanding Minoan eruption (ca 1500<br />

B.C.) which caused the formation of a caldera and the sea<br />

invasion. The Minoan eruption was characterized by huge<br />

volumes of pumice which covered the existing island. Several<br />

times, later, the volcano erupted again forming the<br />

Palea and Nea Kameni islands. The slopes of the island facing<br />

the caldera are very steep, almost vertical, reaching an<br />

elevation of about 200-300 m a.s 1. Toward the outer periphery<br />

the slopes are, in general, much gentler. The highest<br />

point (566 m a.s.l.) of the island is found in the south east<br />

part of Thera and corresponds to a dome made up of<br />

crystalline limestones (Profitis Ilias) that represent, together<br />

with schists and phyllites, the more ancient island,<br />

before the manifestation of volcanism, whose beginning<br />

has been placed in the Upper Pliocene. The continuing<br />

volcanic activity up to nowadays (last eruption in 1950)<br />

and the related seismic activity exhibit a high risk for the<br />

human settlements and the unstable parts of the caldera<br />

walls.<br />

North of Sicily, in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea, there is<br />

the. volcanic arc of the Aeolian Islands, whose the<br />

southernmost is Vulcano, constituted by many overlapping<br />

volcanic structures (fig. 2). The older one is a stratovolcano,<br />

making all the southern side of the island and partially<br />

facing Sicily; its collapse formed II Piano Caldera.<br />

Northwest of this apparatum, there is a more recent structure<br />

constituted by the Lentia complex, whose collapse<br />

produced again a volcanic depression, inside which La<br />

Fossa cone later grew. Four volcanic cycles have built up<br />

this cone, whose last and huge eruption (only explosive)<br />

occurred at the end of the 19th century at the summit of<br />

La Fossa, occupied at center by the so called Gran Cratere.<br />

The youngest and northernmost center in the island is represented<br />

by Vulcanello, facing the island of Lipari: the<br />

first eruption dates back to the II century B.C., the last to<br />

the XVI century. Vulcano exhibits a very high volcanic risk,<br />

especially in the region corresponding to La Fossa cone,<br />

because of the predominant explosive characteristics of<br />

the eruptions and the presence of human settlements. A<br />

major hazard problem concerns slope instability, strictly<br />

related to and sometimes triggered by the volcanic (nowadays<br />

mostly fumarolic) activity.<br />

A comparison between the two described volcanic scenarios<br />

has been performed by carrying out a quantitative<br />

study of the geomorphological settings of Vulcano and<br />

Santorini. The analysis takes into account as input data sets<br />

303

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!