03.04.2013 Views

The Mystical Hymns of Orpheus - Platonic Philosophy

The Mystical Hymns of Orpheus - Platonic Philosophy

The Mystical Hymns of Orpheus - Platonic Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ADDITIONAL NOTES.<br />

respect to the two coordinations, the natures which are<br />

coordinate with the one, he passes by in silence, but those<br />

alone which are coordinate with the indefinite duad, he<br />

unfolds through genealogy. And on this account Plato<br />

now thinks Hesiod deserves to be mentioned, for passing<br />

by the natures prior to Heaven, as being ineffable. For<br />

this also is indicated concerning them by the Oracles,<br />

which likewise add, " they possess mystic silence." And<br />

Socrates himself, in the Phsdrus, calls the intellectual per-<br />

ception <strong>of</strong> them pvqcis and eromE(a, in which nearly the<br />

whole business is ineffable and unknown.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theology <strong>of</strong> Hesiod from the monad Rhea produces,<br />

according to things which are more excellent in the coordi-<br />

nation, Vesta ; but according to those which are subordi-<br />

nate, Juno; and according to those which subsist between,<br />

Ceres. But according to <strong>Orpheus</strong>, Ceres is in a certain<br />

respect the same with the whole <strong>of</strong> vivification, and in a<br />

certain respect is not the same. For on high she is Rhea,<br />

but below, in conjunction with Jupiter, she is Ceres: for<br />

here the things begotten are similar to the begetters, and<br />

are nearly the same.<br />

Again, we ought to receive with caution what is now<br />

said concerning effiuxions and motions. For Socrates does<br />

not descend to the material flowing <strong>of</strong> Heraclitus ; for<br />

this is false %, and unworthy the dianoetic conceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

Plato. But since it is lawful to interpret things divine<br />

analogously, through appropriate images, Socrates very pro-<br />

perly assimilates fontal and Saturnian deities to streams ;<br />

in so doing jesting and at the same time acting seriously,<br />

because good is always derived as it were in streams from<br />

on high, to things below. Hence, according to the image<br />

<strong>of</strong> rivers, after the fontal deities, who eternally devolve<br />

streams <strong>of</strong> good, the deities who subsist as principles are<br />

22 That ie to say, it is false to assert <strong>of</strong> intellectual and divine natures.<br />

that they are in a perpetual flux; for they are eternally stable themselves,<br />

and are the sources <strong>of</strong> stability to other things.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!