05.04.2013 Views

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The NSSE survey is conducted every two years; <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012<br />

surveys with regard to academic advising show that <strong>Keuka</strong> continuously ranks above <strong>the</strong> 3, or<br />

“good” category, in response to <strong>the</strong> question, “Overall, how would you evaluate <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong><br />

academic advising you have received at your institution?” Moreover, <strong>the</strong> data below from <strong>the</strong><br />

traditional program shows in general an upward trend from 2006 to 2010 in <strong>the</strong> overall rating <strong>of</strong><br />

academic advising at <strong>the</strong> freshman and senior year, although with a slight decline for <strong>the</strong> most<br />

recent survey administration. The NSSE Senior ASAP mean response for 2008, 2010, and 2012<br />

for Academic Advising is 3.13, 3.13, and 3.07 respectively.<br />

Table 5.4 Academic Advising NSSE Survey Question 2006-2012<br />

NSSE 2012<br />

NSSE 2010<br />

NSSE 2008<br />

NSSE 2006<br />

<strong>Keuka</strong> College Selected Peers Carnegie Class NSSE National<br />

FY 3.12 3.20 3.12 3.11<br />

SR 3.07 3.13 3.10 3.00<br />

FY 3.16 3.17 3.10 3.07<br />

SR 3.19 3.19 3.06 2.94<br />

FY 3.10 3.05 3.11 3.0<br />

SR 3.15 3.04 3.03 2.85<br />

FY 3.09 3.04 2.96 2.94<br />

SR 3.11 3.03 2.97 2.82<br />

<strong>Keuka</strong>’s strength in academic advising reflects <strong>the</strong> attention it receives as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four<br />

“pillars” for faculty evaluation. The category Non-classroom instruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Faculty<br />

Responsibility Agreement (FRA) requires faculty and faculty evaluators to address performance<br />

in <strong>the</strong> following areas:<br />

Proper advisement procedures<br />

Assist students in investigating options and making appropriate decisions regarding<br />

academic concerns<br />

Provide assistance in planning schedules to meet college and major requirements<br />

Assist in directing students to college services as needed<br />

Provide effective assistance in planning and evaluating Field Periods<br />

Probationary faculty report regularly on <strong>the</strong>ir success (or challenges) as academic advisors in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir annual <strong>self</strong>-evaluation, and advising as a whole is monitored closely by <strong>the</strong> division chairs.<br />

New faculty are first introduced to <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> academic advising during <strong>the</strong> New Faculty<br />

Orientation program, and <strong>the</strong>y typically work with a more seasoned faculty member during <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

first year to learn more about institutional policies and procedures relevant to advising issues.<br />

Page 16 <strong>of</strong> 39 Chapter 5: Admissions, Retention & Support

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!