05.04.2013 Views

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>document</strong>s provided each program with a specific and usable template to help structure<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir assessment work, <strong>the</strong>re was no requirement to use <strong>the</strong>se exact templates. Some<br />

programs (most notably <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional programs) had existing, very robust and useful<br />

assessment and reporting structures, <strong>of</strong>ten dictated by <strong>the</strong>ir external accrediting bodies.<br />

As long as <strong>the</strong> assessment ‘essentials’ (i.e., learning goals, curriculum maps, reporting<br />

cycles, and reporting templates) were clearly evident, <strong>the</strong>se different reporting <strong>document</strong>s<br />

were approved for use. However, every program was required to submit <strong>the</strong> <strong>document</strong>:<br />

“Part 1: Alignment <strong>of</strong> Program and E-LEAP Goals” from <strong>the</strong> “Essentials” packet to<br />

ensure and <strong>document</strong> program and E-LEAP goal alignment.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> Program Assessment <strong>of</strong> Student Learning<br />

Program Assessment Example: Sociology/Criminology/Criminal Justice Program<br />

As an example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment plans and reporting that all programs are asked to<br />

conduct, Appendix 4.37 Sociology/Criminology, Criminal Justice Assessment Plan and<br />

Report shows <strong>the</strong> assessment plan and evidence for this major. The assessment plan<br />

details <strong>the</strong> purposes for program assessment, guiding assessment questions, sources <strong>of</strong><br />

evidence, collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> evidence, <strong>the</strong> criteria for successful achievement <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> outcome, and <strong>the</strong> reporting and use <strong>of</strong> evidence by <strong>the</strong> program. The learning<br />

opportunities/curriculum map also includes <strong>the</strong> assessment cycle built in (see color<br />

coding). The assessment plan contains all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Assessment’ plus<br />

more information (e.g., ‘Guiding Assessment Questions’). The assessment report clearly<br />

indicates <strong>the</strong> plan and analysis data. (Appendix 4.26 Student Learning Outcomes<br />

Assessment Report Template) Finally, <strong>the</strong> report shows how assessment evidence has<br />

been used to “close <strong>the</strong> loop” in <strong>the</strong> “Use <strong>of</strong> Assessment Results” column. For example,<br />

students in SOC 201 students were asked to complete multi-week projects involving<br />

research and content analysis <strong>of</strong> news programs so as to demonstrate ability to apply<br />

knowledge gained in <strong>the</strong> classroom to data sets to meet <strong>the</strong> program’s experiential<br />

learning outcome. In <strong>the</strong> initial evaluation, students performed poorly, and it was<br />

recognized that student needed more guidance in analyzing and interpreting numerical<br />

data. Students were provided significantly more detailed instructions, examples, and<br />

prompts to guide <strong>the</strong>ir conclusions. Resubmissions showed great improvement, with all<br />

students <strong>the</strong>n successful in meeting or exceeding <strong>the</strong> expected level <strong>of</strong> performance for<br />

this course. Future program improvements as a result <strong>of</strong> this analysis include changes to<br />

<strong>the</strong> coursework in o<strong>the</strong>r program courses so as to require more applications <strong>of</strong> statistical<br />

techniques to analyze data relevant to <strong>the</strong>ir field <strong>of</strong> <strong>study</strong>.<br />

Program Assessment Example: English<br />

In ano<strong>the</strong>r example <strong>of</strong> assessment reporting wherein <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> analysis have led to<br />

changes, <strong>the</strong> English faculty came to <strong>the</strong> conclusion to alter <strong>the</strong>ir overall assessment plan,<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> evaluating students’ achievement <strong>of</strong> two program learning outcomes. In<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir 2012 report, <strong>the</strong> English faculty noted that <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> courses identified in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

original assessment plan to measure “Historical Development and Cultural Context” and<br />

“Language” was too long and <strong>the</strong> courses <strong>the</strong>mselves were not well suited for assessing<br />

<strong>the</strong>se two goals. They determined that by working with a smaller grouping <strong>of</strong> courses<br />

that are more applicable to <strong>the</strong> learning goal and “even more specifically to <strong>the</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 18 <strong>of</strong> 31 Chapter 4: Inst. Effectiveness & Assessment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!