05.04.2013 Views

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Program and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keuka</strong> Vietnam Program. For example, <strong>the</strong> same learning goals exist in<br />

<strong>the</strong> overseas Business programs as in <strong>the</strong> traditional program in New York.<br />

Consequently, <strong>the</strong> assessment measures are aligned among all three general locations<br />

(i.e., <strong>Keuka</strong> Park, China, Vietnam), with all students completing <strong>the</strong> capstone course BUS<br />

444 Strategic Management and taking a comprehensive business exam covering <strong>the</strong><br />

functional components <strong>of</strong> business, administered at <strong>the</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capstone<br />

course.<br />

Annual assessment reports for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keuka</strong> China Program (KCP) reveal significant<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> meeting <strong>the</strong> target goals for <strong>the</strong> comprehensive business exam, linked to<br />

English language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency and some coursework reflecting American principles and<br />

practices. This exam has been a struggle for students since piloting in Dec. 2008, and as<br />

a result, <strong>the</strong> test items were revised and a number <strong>of</strong> questions were eliminated. Poor<br />

results in subsequent years were a factor in <strong>the</strong> revision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> curriculum in 2010 and <strong>the</strong><br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> curriculum mapping and syllabus template updates in 2011 and 2012<br />

to focus on student learning outcomes. This year <strong>the</strong> spring faculty workshop will focus<br />

on assessment at course level, with an aim to build up <strong>the</strong> English vocabulary, content<br />

knowledge and analytical skills needed for business in general and for <strong>the</strong> comprehensive<br />

exam in particular. The Business Division is also considering <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> a different<br />

exam for 2013.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second direct measure <strong>of</strong> program outcomes, <strong>the</strong> capstone project in BUS<br />

444 Strategic Planning, shows that 90% <strong>of</strong> all students (n=784) met <strong>the</strong> criteria for<br />

success (a grade <strong>of</strong> C). Indirect measures employed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keuka</strong> China Program include<br />

<strong>the</strong> Comprehensive Alumni Assessment Survey and <strong>the</strong> National Survey <strong>of</strong> Student<br />

Engagement. Customized relevant questions were combined into <strong>the</strong> Chinese student<br />

survey that <strong>Keuka</strong> administered online in May 2012 to students from <strong>the</strong> entering classes<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, with a response rate <strong>of</strong> 701 students or 24%. The overall<br />

question measuring student satisfaction with <strong>the</strong> program was “If you had to do it all<br />

over, would you attend <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keuka</strong> Program?” The target is for 80% <strong>of</strong> students to<br />

respond positively, across all <strong>Keuka</strong> China campuses. Overall, <strong>Keuka</strong> met its goal for<br />

2012, with 88.4% <strong>of</strong> respondents said <strong>the</strong>y would definitely (51%) or possibly (38%)<br />

attend <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keuka</strong> China program again. (In 2010, 6% had said <strong>the</strong>y would not choose<br />

<strong>Keuka</strong> again, and in 2011, 17.5% had said <strong>the</strong>y would not attend <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keuka</strong> China<br />

program again.) O<strong>the</strong>r questions reflected student engagement, with 70% <strong>of</strong> students<br />

responding positively that <strong>the</strong>y experienced intellectual growth; a focus on experiential<br />

learning, with 98% saying <strong>the</strong>y worked with o<strong>the</strong>r students on class projects; and variety<br />

in learning style, with student responses reflecting a distribution <strong>of</strong> student experience<br />

over a range <strong>of</strong> learning styles ra<strong>the</strong>r than on one dominant type. Retention and<br />

graduation rates are a reflection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faculty and student efforts throughout <strong>the</strong> program,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> overall cumulative graduation rate for <strong>the</strong> program from 2003-2012 is 85%.<br />

Recent improvements that were implemented in 2011-2012 include providing a <strong>study</strong><br />

guide for <strong>the</strong> comprehensive exam to KCP students, more tightly constructed syllabus<br />

templates with assessment measures tied more explicitly to course outcomes, and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a common rubric for <strong>the</strong> <strong>final</strong> project, with sharing <strong>of</strong> work samples that<br />

Page 21 <strong>of</strong> 31 Chapter 4: Inst. Effectiveness & Assessment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!