final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mid-Semester Progress Reports – To enhance early intervention efforts, in Fall 2009 the ASK Office, with the approval of the faculty Instruction Committee, piloted a mid-semester academic progress report for all first year students. Based on attendance and assignments completed by mid-term, instructors rate student performance as either satisfactory or unsatisfactory, and the ASK Office contacts each student who receives a “U” to encourage them to work with ASK professionals. The faculty voted to continue the Mid-Semester Progress Reports, for as the data shows in Table 5.16 below, the majority of first-year students who receive a report of Unsatisfactory and then employ ASK Offices services go on to be successful in the course. The migration of data from Jenzabar to Colleague made the Report unfeasible for the 2011-2012 academic year, but the College anticipates resuming its use in the 2012-2013 academic year. Greater participation from the faculty, however, is needed to make this retention effort more successful, since in 2010-2011, fewer than half of the faculty had implemented this practice in all their freshman courses. Table 5.16 Mid-Semester Progress Reports # of students with U % of students receiving U who work with ASK Fall 2009 84 (38%) 35 (41%) 19 (54%) Spring 2010 72 (27%) 27 (37%) 15 (55%) Fall 2010 104 (38%) 50 (50%) 31 (60%) Spring 2011 72 (28%) 34 (47%) 22 (65%) % of ASK “U” students passing the course Fall 2011 Data migration Data migration Data migration Spring 2012 Data migration Data migration Data migration Assistance to Students with Disabilities—Services provided to on-campus and ASAP students with disabilities are arranged through the ASK Office and include individual and group tutoring, readers, scribes, alternative testing, and counseling. Data on ASK utilization by this population is shown in Table 5.17 (next page), and indicates the success rate of those who employ the services and accommodations provided to them through ASK. The challenge is to encourage more students to use these resources. Page 32 of 39 Chapter 5: Admissions, Retention & Support
Table 5.17 Utilization of ASK Services by Campus Students with Disabilities Incoming Year Used Services Average Fall GPA Fall - Fall retention Graduation Rate -- Still Enrolled Fall 2006 17 2.769 16 - 94% 15 - 88% Fall 2007 21 2.98 21 - 100% 18 - 86% Fall 2008 31 2.75 20 - 65% 16 - 52% Fall 2009 19 2.742 14 - 74% 14 - 74% Fall 2010 16 2.87 13 - 81% 9 - 56% Fall 2011 18 2.987 18 - 100% 18 - 100% Incoming Year DID NOT Use services Average Fall GPA Fall - Fall retention Fall 2006 8 2 4 - 50% 0 Fall 2007 22 1.7 9 - 55% 3 - 14% Fall 2008 13 1.9 7 - 54% 4 - 31% Fall 2009 19 2.1 10 - 53% 7 - 37% Fall 2010 12 1.78 7 - 58% 3 - 25% Fall 2011 15 1.84 9 - 60% 9 - 60% Graduation Rate -- Still Enrolled As part of ongoing assessment, the ASK Office surveys those students who use their services at the end of each semester. These surveys inform decisions such as the rescheduling of meeting times to better fit into student schedules, on-line tutoring to better meet off-campus student needs, and the addition of a writing coordinator for the ASAP students. ASK staff also use information from the Noel-Levitz Survey and the NSSE survey to assess their effectiveness. The surveys all support the positive impact that the ASK department has on Keuka students. The Noel-Levitz data demonstrated an increasing positive perception of the availability of tutoring services between 2006 and 2010 with services matching the expectations of students. The NSSE data asks students if the institution provided support needed to help them succeed academically. ASK scored above 3 (on a consistent basis) each year, comparing favorably to both peer and Carnegie classification institutions. The fall 2011 in-house survey indicated that 98% of students who came in to use ASK services were more confident in their academic ability, and 99% believed that they would achieve better grades. Retention Alert Module of the Colleague ERP System— The module is part of the College’s new ERP system and was put on-line during the spring of 2012. The system will help manage retention efforts, with academic affairs and student affairs professionals working together to Page 33 of 39 Chapter 5: Admissions, Retention & Support
Page 2 and 3:
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Page 4 and 5:
Appendix Document Title Middle Stat
Page 6 and 7:
Appendix Document Middle States Sel
Page 8 and 9:
4.41 Business China Program 2011-20
Page 10:
Middle States Self Study Chapter 6
Page 13 and 14:
esponses to open-ended questions ab
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 5: Admissions, Retention an
Page 17 and 18:
esponse to their recommendations, t
Page 19 and 20:
TURNAROUND 20 STRESS FACTORS Stress
Page 21 and 22:
administration identified three gro
Page 23 and 24:
courses, Field Periods, practica, e
Page 25 and 26:
possess the knowledge and experienc
Page 27 and 28:
As this Self-Study documents, Keuka
Page 29 and 30:
offer online course and accelerated
Page 31 and 32:
The Student Code of Conduct, as pro
Page 33 and 34:
Handbook, but policies governing fa
Page 35 and 36:
The Taskforce on Academic Program P
Page 37 and 38:
The Strategic Planning Committee (r
Page 39 and 40:
future through expanding programs a
Page 41 and 42:
process, and associated timeline, r
Page 43 and 44:
times per year for the Vice Preside
Page 45 and 46:
was retained in early Fall 2012 to
Page 47 and 48:
full-time and two part-time employe
Page 49 and 50:
Table 2.4 Distance Education Enroll
Page 51 and 52:
Interfund loan of approximately $1.
Page 53 and 54:
A systems management component that
Page 55 and 56:
2010-11 Actual 2.0% 2.0% 2011-12 Ac
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 3 Leadership, Governance, a
Page 59 and 60:
President for Center for Profession
Page 61 and 62:
The Committee on Trustees has been
Page 63 and 64:
Range Strategic Planning Committee
Page 65 and 66:
the transition process. He was full
Page 67 and 68:
provides advice, recommendations an
Page 69 and 70:
committee work and are brought to t
Page 71 and 72:
Staff The Staff of Keuka College pa
Page 73 and 74:
At this time, students in the overs
Page 75 and 76:
greater opportunities than ever bef
Page 77 and 78:
Data-Driven Strategic Planning As n
Page 79 and 80:
as well, such as continuing to inve
Page 81 and 82:
along with members of the Student S
Page 83 and 84:
4,000 students (1,000 FTE) in China
Page 85 and 86:
esult, our analysis of non-academic
Page 87 and 88: Effective learning assessment start
Page 89 and 90: assessment cycle have been schedule
Page 91 and 92: own work effectively. Future assess
Page 93 and 94: documents provided each program wit
Page 95 and 96: make oral presentations and partici
Page 97 and 98: meet the criteria to allow faculty
Page 99 and 100: The lead faculty member reviews ass
Page 101 and 102: outcomes. The Center for Experienti
Page 103 and 104: assessment data for improvement acr
Page 105 and 106: Beyond assessment that channels up
Page 107 and 108: Standard 8: Student Admissions and
Page 109 and 110: Chart 5.3 ASAP Undergraduate and Gr
Page 111 and 112: events, College branding, transfer
Page 113 and 114: Cumulative grade point average of 2
Page 115 and 116: oth the partner school and Keuka to
Page 117 and 118: Table 5.2 Scholarship Yield Analysi
Page 119 and 120: and tour the residence halls. Stude
Page 121 and 122: Learning through participation in a
Page 123 and 124: Faculty members usually employ a co
Page 125 and 126: Table 5.5 Campus ASK Appointments 2
Page 127 and 128: Fall 2010 259 156 83 or 53% 40 or 4
Page 129 and 130: students with the skills and strate
Page 131 and 132: *The Library pays for the add-ons a
Page 133 and 134: Retention and Graduation Rates The
Page 135 and 136: First Year Experience program— In
Page 137: analysis of historical persistence
Page 141 and 142: Campus Life Beyond the classroom, t
Page 143 and 144: nature of courses, laboratories, an
Page 145 and 146: Recommendations: 5.1 Assess the rec
Page 147 and 148: Table 6.1 Keuka College Faculty Lin
Page 149 and 150: ASAP Table 6.5 ASAP Faculty Lines 2
Page 151 and 152: appointments will participate in an
Page 153 and 154: online video orientation materials
Page 155 and 156: Faculty members seeking to attend a
Page 157 and 158: Likert Scale, from “strongly disa
Page 159 and 160: Committee review of faculty files,
Page 161 and 162: Educational Offerings The Mission o
Page 163 and 164: Presentation 47 39.2% Case Study 17
Page 165 and 166: 2. “Coursework emphasized: synthe
Page 167 and 168: To support student learning at each
Page 169 and 170: Organizational Management, and Crim
Page 171 and 172: Keuka enrolls international student
Page 173 and 174: Rubric). The learning goal is pract
Page 175 and 176: College Writing, and/or MAT 095, De
Page 177 and 178: • The Dean provides ongoing suppo
Page 179 and 180: policies and procedures, a copy of
Page 181 and 182: Credit for Prior Learning Keuka Col
Page 183 and 184: outcomes are evaluated throughout t
Page 185 and 186: GLOSSARY January 2013 Middle States
Page 187 and 188: DRIVE Diversity, Responsibility, In
Page 189 and 190:
NS,M&PE Natural Sciences, Mathemati
show all

final version of the self-study document - Keuka College's Middle ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?