05.04.2013 Views

Constructing Ionian identities: the Ionian Islands in British official ...

Constructing Ionian identities: the Ionian Islands in British official ...

Constructing Ionian identities: the Ionian Islands in British official ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Charles Grant, Lord Glenelg, was a liberal Tory, supporter of free trade and<br />

Catholic emancipation, and was appo<strong>in</strong>ted Colonial Secretary <strong>in</strong> 1835 dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Melbourne’s adm<strong>in</strong>istration. However, not all prom<strong>in</strong>ent Whigs, especially <strong>the</strong> Home<br />

Secretary, Lord John Russell, supported Glenelg’s participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cab<strong>in</strong>et as<br />

Glenelg had not voted for <strong>the</strong> Great Reform Act. Glenelg was considered liberal and<br />

a humanitarian <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment of <strong>in</strong>digenous peoples <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Empire. In December<br />

1835, Glenelg forbade Sir Benjam<strong>in</strong> D’Urban, governor of <strong>the</strong> Cape, to annex <strong>the</strong><br />

Queen Adelaide Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, a region predom<strong>in</strong>antly settled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous Xhosa<br />

population but coveted by white settlers. 81 Glenelg also opposed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>flux of <strong>British</strong><br />

settlers <strong>in</strong>to New Zealand partly because of his concern for <strong>the</strong> fate of <strong>the</strong> Maoris and<br />

persisted <strong>in</strong> his policy until 1837. 82<br />

In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ionian</strong> <strong>Islands</strong>, however, Glenelg presented his authoritarian side and<br />

was aga<strong>in</strong>st alter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ionian</strong> Constitution of 1817. It was one th<strong>in</strong>g to be<br />

humanitarian and liberal to <strong>the</strong> depredations of settlers aga<strong>in</strong>st native peoples, but it<br />

was quite ano<strong>the</strong>r to rel<strong>in</strong>quish imperial control over a European territory important<br />

geopolitically and strategically for Brita<strong>in</strong>’s policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean. Glenelg<br />

supported Douglas and believed “…<strong>the</strong> abolition of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g restrictions would<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r be an <strong>in</strong>jury, than a good to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ionian</strong> people”. 83 But <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ionian</strong>s’ cultural and<br />

educational deficiencies were not <strong>the</strong> reasons Glenelg rejected <strong>the</strong>ir right to freedom<br />

81 Lester A., Imperial Networks: Creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>identities</strong> <strong>in</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century South Africa and Brita<strong>in</strong>,<br />

(London and New York, 2001), chapters 2, 5.<br />

82 Adams P., Fatal Necessity: <strong>British</strong> Intervention <strong>in</strong> New Zealand 1830-1847, (Auckland, 1977), p.<br />

101.<br />

83 Ibid.<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!