Fruit-frugivore interactions in a Malagasy littoral forest - Universiteit ...
Fruit-frugivore interactions in a Malagasy littoral forest - Universiteit ...
Fruit-frugivore interactions in a Malagasy littoral forest - Universiteit ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 4<br />
Mean temperature is around 24.7°C and relative humidity varies between 58% and 67%<br />
with an average of 63% (Rakotonir<strong>in</strong>a 1996; Sorg and Rohner 1996). The canopy<br />
reaches 10-12m <strong>in</strong> height. Trees with DBH50%) consists of fruits and/or seeds so<br />
they may be considered as possible seed dispersers. Two lemur species were studied <strong>in</strong><br />
more detail for this study. These were Eulemur fulvus rufus <strong>in</strong> KIR and E. f. collaris <strong>in</strong> STL<br />
and Cheirogaleus medius at both sites. These species, particularly E. fulvus, are<br />
supposed to represent very important, if not essential, seed dispersers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Malagasy</strong><br />
<strong>forest</strong>s (Ganzhorn et al. 1999a).<br />
Phenology and pluviometry<br />
In STL a phenological transect with a total of 423 <strong>in</strong>dividual trees belong<strong>in</strong>g to 95 species<br />
and 43 families was set up by AB and GD and monitored between January 2000 and<br />
January 2001. Trees sampled for phenology had a DBH>5cm and an effort was made to<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> five <strong>in</strong>dividuals per species whenever possible. Twice a month, presence or<br />
absence of young leaves, flowers, unripe and ripe fruits were recorded. A Tru-Check Ra<strong>in</strong><br />
Gauge was <strong>in</strong>stalled at the campsite <strong>in</strong> December 1999. It was checked and emptied<br />
each morn<strong>in</strong>g around 06h00. dur<strong>in</strong>g the whole study period. For KIR ra<strong>in</strong>fall and<br />
phenological data were taken from Sorg and Rohner (1996) <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g 80 <strong>in</strong>dividual trees<br />
of 56 species (26 families) monitored over several years (1978-1987). For the present<br />
phenology analysis only large overstory tree species were considered. Small trees,<br />
shrubs, v<strong>in</strong>es and epiphytes were left out <strong>in</strong> order to allow comparison between sites. A<br />
subsample of both phenologies (STL: 54 spp., KIR: 32 spp.) was extracted to <strong>in</strong>clude only<br />
those plant species that had been characterised morphologically (see below).<br />
Plant and fruit characteristics<br />
In STL and KIR fruits of 173 and 171 plant species belong<strong>in</strong>g to 58 and 47 families<br />
Morphological characteristics<br />
Variables used to characterise fruits were:<br />
Growth form of parent plant: large tree, small tree and shrub, others<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g herbs, v<strong>in</strong>es and epiphytes);<br />
<strong>Fruit</strong> type: berry, drupe, capsule, pod, samara, synconia, others;<br />
Pulp type: juicy soft, juicy fibrous, dry fibrous, aril, no pulp;<br />
(<strong>in</strong> phenology ‘fleshy’ fruits are characterised as juicy soft, juicy fibrous or arillate; ‘nonfleshy’<br />
fruits are dry fibrous or do not have any pulp);<br />
Colour: yellow-orange, red, purple, brown, green, others (black, grey and white),<br />
(multicoloured fruits were put <strong>in</strong> the category of the most conspicuous colour present);<br />
Odour: absent, present;<br />
114