06.04.2013 Views

Fruit-frugivore interactions in a Malagasy littoral forest - Universiteit ...

Fruit-frugivore interactions in a Malagasy littoral forest - Universiteit ...

Fruit-frugivore interactions in a Malagasy littoral forest - Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

(Ganzhorn et al. 1999a). Madagascar <strong>in</strong> general, already has a depauperate avian<br />

<strong>frugivore</strong> community (Langrand 1990; Goodman et al. 1997a) and lacks larger <strong>frugivore</strong>s<br />

such as rum<strong>in</strong>ants, ungulates and elephants. Moreover one third of lemur species<br />

became ext<strong>in</strong>ct years ago (Godfrey et al. 1997). Thus emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g even more the<br />

importance of the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g seed dispersers here. Large <strong>frugivore</strong>s, such as E. f. collaris,<br />

are often most vulnerable to habitat fragmentation which is conform f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at other sites<br />

(Johns and Skorupa 1987; Kannan and James 1999). The vulnerability of E. f. collaris is<br />

reflected by the fact that this species is only present <strong>in</strong> the two largest and most <strong>in</strong>tact<br />

fragments, S9 and S17, but absent <strong>in</strong> all other, smaller fragments <strong>in</strong> Sa<strong>in</strong>te Luce<br />

(Ganzhorn et al. 2000). E. f. collaris is <strong>in</strong> particular important for seed dispersal of<br />

numerous plant species and it is the only <strong>frugivore</strong> present here that is able to swallow<br />

and thus disperse larger seeds (up to 16.5mm diameter, Table 1). Therefore, local<br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction of this species could ultimately lead to the lack of regeneration of different<br />

dependant plant species. Other specialist <strong>frugivore</strong>s, such as Pteropus rufus, Treron<br />

australis and Alectroenas madagascariensis, are very vulnerable as well, <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

when important food sources are selectively logged (Table 1). Frugivorous birds and<br />

fly<strong>in</strong>g foxes are the most important mobile seed dispersers br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g seeds <strong>in</strong>to grasslands<br />

and early succession vegetation. The simple structure of these habitats pose less of a<br />

barrier to them than it does for arboreal lemurs. Genetic exchange and long distance<br />

dispersal between and among fragments are less likely to occur, if populations of mobile<br />

fly<strong>in</strong>g dispersers decrease or vanish.<br />

Our studies showed that no evidence for co-evolution could be found, nor were there<br />

strong <strong>in</strong>dications for syndromes that attract taxonomic groups by certa<strong>in</strong> morphological<br />

and/or nutritional traits (Bollen et al., Chapter 2, 3, 4; Bollen et al. <strong>in</strong> press). Instead we<br />

found that there is great dietary overlap among <strong>frugivore</strong> species and that dispersal is<br />

achieved through redundant systems. Most <strong>frugivore</strong>s seem to eat accord<strong>in</strong>g to what is<br />

available, given the limitation of fruit and seed size and certa<strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g preferences.<br />

Animal seed dispersers are vital for the regeneration of <strong>littoral</strong> <strong>forest</strong>s. Especially s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

losses of ecologically <strong>in</strong>terdependent species will be permanent to an even larger extent<br />

here as <strong>forest</strong> fragments are very isolated. Due to co-dependency of <strong>frugivore</strong>s and tree<br />

species, the hunt on <strong>frugivore</strong>s leads to suboptimal or <strong>in</strong>sufficient dispersal and<br />

recruitment success of certa<strong>in</strong> plant species (Chapman and Onderdonk 1998; McConkey<br />

and Drake 2002) while de<strong>forest</strong>ation, <strong>forest</strong> degradation and fragmentation has a drastic<br />

impact on the food cha<strong>in</strong> of the frugivorous fauna.<br />

PROTECTION OF THE LITTORAL FOREST<br />

Forest<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>forest</strong> fragments, which act as reservoirs from where <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

floral and faunal species can colonize new habitats are <strong>in</strong> urgent need for protection.<br />

Even though the <strong>littoral</strong> <strong>forest</strong> only represents 5% of all <strong>forest</strong> cover <strong>in</strong> the south-eastern<br />

region (QIT Madagascar M<strong>in</strong>erals 2001), the importance of its conservation cannot be<br />

emphasized enough. At present, Sa<strong>in</strong>te Luce conta<strong>in</strong>s the most <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>littoral</strong> <strong>forest</strong><br />

fragments on sand, which differ strongly <strong>in</strong> floristic diversity from the one on laterite and<br />

from the <strong>in</strong>land montane <strong>forest</strong> (Rabevohitra et al. 1996; Dumetz 1999). Ideally<br />

conservation zones should be large enough to encompass the micro-heterogeneity <strong>in</strong><br />

order to avoid their effective elim<strong>in</strong>ation. In this respect, the <strong>forest</strong> fragments S9 and S17<br />

have the highest conservation priority, represent<strong>in</strong>g the two largest and most <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>forest</strong><br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!