19.05.2013 Views

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Refugees: Tightening the Screw 99<br />

travelled through, which may or may not be ‘safe’ in reality. Germany and<br />

France changed their constitutions to enable them to return asylum seekers<br />

to neighbouring states. The only way to be sure of avoiding this is to claim<br />

‘in-country’, when the authorities must finally consider a claim. Frances<br />

Webber, in Crimes of Arrival, cites, as examples of what can happen to those<br />

who claim asylum at port of entry,<br />

the 17-year-old Somali boy who had witnessed his mother being killed and had fled<br />

via Italy to join his only surviving relative in the UK, who was returned to Italy. Or the<br />

Somali man with shrapnel lodged in his head, given painkillers and put back on the<br />

plane to Italy ... the examples are legion.<br />

Detention centres and prisons in Britain contain people who are bemused<br />

and distressed because they have been picked up and detained when they<br />

were on their way to another country. Worse, in early 1999 there were, in<br />

addition to the 800 or so people detained under immigration rules, 450<br />

people imprisoned in ordinary prisons, including Wormwood Scrubs and<br />

Holloway, with criminal convictions for travelling on forged papers; most of<br />

them were picked up at Heathrow on their way to claim asylum in the United<br />

States or Canada, a claim that their criminal records would now cause to be<br />

ruled out, and had been advised by duty solicitors to plead guilty to shorten<br />

their sentences. In July 1999 two judges in the High Court, in response to<br />

cases brought by an Algerian, an Iraqi Kurd and an Albanian, ruled that the<br />

government was in breach of its obligations under article 31 of the Geneva<br />

Convention which states that asylum seekers should not be penalised for<br />

entering a country illegally; Lord Justice Simon Brown said that:<br />

It must be hoped that these challenges will mark a turning point in the crown’s<br />

approach to the prosecution of refugees for travelling on false passports. Article 31<br />

must henceforth be honoured.<br />

The judge added that the combination of visa requirements and carrier’s<br />

liability ‘has made it well nigh impossible for refugees to travel to countries<br />

of refuge without false passports’. Criminal prosecution of refugees holding<br />

false documents has now been put on hold. But those still in prison were told<br />

they could not simply be released but would have to reopen their cases<br />

through the courts. One of the ‘reasons’ the Home Office gives for detaining<br />

refugees continues to be their use of false documents.<br />

Most asylum seekers have little idea what they ought to do on arrival in<br />

Britain. An African who later got refugee status went through immigration<br />

control on arrival, spent the night sleeping rough in Trafalgar Square, and<br />

eventually managed to get to Croydon and apply for asylum there. Refugees<br />

may not wish to approach uniformed officials until they have taken advice<br />

from friends. Usually their only source of advice before arrival is the agents<br />

who have brought them to Britain, whose interests may not be the same as<br />

those of the refugees. Some are told by these agents that they will get some<br />

money back if they go through immigration and hand over their false

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!