Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter
Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter
Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Refugees: Tightening the Screw 99<br />
travelled through, which may or may not be ‘safe’ in reality. Germany and<br />
France changed their constitutions to enable them to return asylum seekers<br />
to neighbouring states. The only way to be sure of avoiding this is to claim<br />
‘in-country’, when the authorities must finally consider a claim. Frances<br />
Webber, in Crimes of Arrival, cites, as examples of what can happen to those<br />
who claim asylum at port of entry,<br />
the 17-year-old Somali boy who had witnessed his mother being killed and had fled<br />
via Italy to join his only surviving relative in the UK, who was returned to Italy. Or the<br />
Somali man with shrapnel lodged in his head, given painkillers and put back on the<br />
plane to Italy ... the examples are legion.<br />
Detention centres and prisons in Britain contain people who are bemused<br />
and distressed because they have been picked up and detained when they<br />
were on their way to another country. Worse, in early 1999 there were, in<br />
addition to the 800 or so people detained under immigration rules, 450<br />
people imprisoned in ordinary prisons, including Wormwood Scrubs and<br />
Holloway, with criminal convictions for travelling on forged papers; most of<br />
them were picked up at Heathrow on their way to claim asylum in the United<br />
States or Canada, a claim that their criminal records would now cause to be<br />
ruled out, and had been advised by duty solicitors to plead guilty to shorten<br />
their sentences. In July 1999 two judges in the High Court, in response to<br />
cases brought by an Algerian, an Iraqi Kurd and an Albanian, ruled that the<br />
government was in breach of its obligations under article 31 of the Geneva<br />
Convention which states that asylum seekers should not be penalised for<br />
entering a country illegally; Lord Justice Simon Brown said that:<br />
It must be hoped that these challenges will mark a turning point in the crown’s<br />
approach to the prosecution of refugees for travelling on false passports. Article 31<br />
must henceforth be honoured.<br />
The judge added that the combination of visa requirements and carrier’s<br />
liability ‘has made it well nigh impossible for refugees to travel to countries<br />
of refuge without false passports’. Criminal prosecution of refugees holding<br />
false documents has now been put on hold. But those still in prison were told<br />
they could not simply be released but would have to reopen their cases<br />
through the courts. One of the ‘reasons’ the Home Office gives for detaining<br />
refugees continues to be their use of false documents.<br />
Most asylum seekers have little idea what they ought to do on arrival in<br />
Britain. An African who later got refugee status went through immigration<br />
control on arrival, spent the night sleeping rough in Trafalgar Square, and<br />
eventually managed to get to Croydon and apply for asylum there. Refugees<br />
may not wish to approach uniformed officials until they have taken advice<br />
from friends. Usually their only source of advice before arrival is the agents<br />
who have brought them to Britain, whose interests may not be the same as<br />
those of the refugees. Some are told by these agents that they will get some<br />
money back if they go through immigration and hand over their false