19.05.2013 Views

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Refugees: Tightening the Screw 123<br />

leader of the Conservative opposition, proposed that all new asylum seekers<br />

should be detained in ‘secure reception centres’. The Home Office response,<br />

according to the Guardian of April 19 2000, was that this would cost ‘an<br />

extra £850 million’ a year. Nevertheless in June the government announced<br />

its intention to increase the number of detention spaces available from 900<br />

to 4,000 so as to be able to detain all those whose applications for asylum<br />

had been turned down.<br />

The detention centres are run by private security firms. Before the election,<br />

according to quotes from the 26 June 1998 issue of Private Eye, Jack Straw<br />

told the 1996 Prison Officers’ Association conference that:<br />

I find it morally unacceptable for the private sector to undertake the incarceration of<br />

those whom the state has decided need to be imprisoned ... almost all people believe<br />

that this is one area where a free market does not exist.<br />

Once in government, he told the 1998 Prison Officers’ Association<br />

conference that:<br />

As a responsible government we have committed ourselves to providing best value<br />

and to achieve high performance, efficiency and effectiveness. Current cost<br />

comparison research indicates that privately managed prisons are between eight and<br />

15 percent less costly than their counterparts in the public sector. The difference is<br />

accounted for almost entirely by lower staff ratios, lower staff costs, including pension<br />

arrangements and salaries; and greater availability of staff with fewer holidays.<br />

Official figures reported in Amnesty International’s Cell Culture were that in<br />

1995 the average cost of holding a person in an immigration detention<br />

centre was ‘about £560 per week’, compared to about £450 in prisons. In<br />

1997, after a mass protest destroyed some of the buildings, the cost per<br />

person per week of detention at Campsfield rose to over £700. But the<br />

detention centres continue to be run by Group 4 and Wackenhut. Group 4<br />

lost the contract for Harmondsworth detention centre in 1999 to another<br />

private company, Burns Ltd, which according to the Home Office press<br />

release (which nevertheless felt obliged to praise Group 4 for its excellent<br />

work) put in a lower bid. Ominously, under Labour’s new Act, the staff of<br />

private contractors are to be given more powers.<br />

CAMPSFIELD IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE<br />

Campsfield ‘House’, as governments like to call it, has been open since 1993,<br />

and is still the largest of the detention centres. The great majority of its<br />

detainees are asylum seekers. Until 1997, around 50 of them were women.<br />

It has the aspect of a concentration camp. Its 20-foot high metal fences have<br />

mesh whose holes are slightly too small for fingers. There are 42 video<br />

cameras on the fence and inside. Periodically, as a result of protests inside<br />

and outside and attempted escapes, the fortifications are added to. Additional

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!