Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter
Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter
Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Refugees: Tightening the Screw 121<br />
The Labour government’s 1999 act provides for two automatic bail<br />
hearings. There is no provision for further bail hearings after the first two.<br />
Bail hearings may be heard in detention centres or prisons, even by TV link.<br />
There is no guarantee of legal representation, although the act does<br />
introduce legal aid for those fortunate enough to have found legal representatives.<br />
The requirement for large sureties is unchanged. The bill did not<br />
provide for a presumption of liberty. An acceptance of this right was one of<br />
the few concessions won in committee and incorporated in the act, but it<br />
was so hedged around with conditions as to be almost meaningless. Some<br />
legal observers believe that the changes will make the situation worse rather<br />
than better, providing a rubber stamp for the arbitrary decisions of<br />
immigration officials.<br />
The more than 800 refugees who are currently detained are held in a<br />
variety of detention centres, in small holding centres at Heathrow, Gatwick<br />
and other ports, in police stations and in many ordinary prisons. Up to half<br />
are in the latter. The use of Pentonville prison was abandoned in the mid-<br />
1990s after its governor and Board of Visitors objected to holding innocent<br />
asylum seekers, and after several hunger strikes by Algerians and the death<br />
in 1993 of a Zairean, Omasese Lumumba, as a result, the inquest jury ruled,<br />
of the ‘use of improper methods and excessive force in the process of control<br />
and restraint’ by prison officers. Asylum seekers began to be detained in the<br />
mid-1980s. Initially the only detention centre available was Harmondsworth,<br />
a decrepit collection of buildings near Heathrow airport, with<br />
a capacity for 95 people; it had been used for immigration detainees since<br />
1970 and was run by private security companies, first Securicor and then<br />
Group 4; it is now finally to be abandoned and replaced in 2002 by a new<br />
detention centre nearby at Hatton Cross, to be run by Burns Ltd, another<br />
private security company. In 1987, when the Home Office ran out of<br />
detention spaces, 100 refugees, mostly Sri Lankan Tamils, were detained in<br />
a converted ferry in Harwich harbour; the ship broke its moorings in a storm<br />
and ran aground, and the experiment was abandoned. In 1989 the Home<br />
Office opened a new detention centre, run by the prison service, in an old<br />
naval barracks at Haslar, near Portsmouth, with a capacity for 150 people;<br />
detainees are kept in two large and noisy dormitories, but have access to<br />
educational facilities and a sports ground. In November 1993 the<br />
government opened another detention centre, Campsfield immigration<br />
detention centre, which has a capacity of 200 and is run by Group 4. In July<br />
1994 and May 1995 D and E wings of Rochester prison were redesignated<br />
as detention wings, with a capacity of 198. Campsfield and Rochester<br />
enabled more asylum seekers to be detained, rather than any reduction in<br />
the numbers held in ordinary prisons. While the latter rose higher than ever,<br />
to around 300, the total numbers detained increased from about 250 in early<br />
1993 to over 600 in 1995 and about 750 in 1996. In May 1996 a new<br />
purpose-built detention centre was opened at Tinsley House (sic) near<br />
Gatwick airport, privately built by a subsidiary of the British Airports