19.05.2013 Views

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Border Controls 55<br />

the guestworker system in other European countries. The act thus increased<br />

the number of people entitled to enter Britain without restriction, but they<br />

were nearly all white. Moreover on the day the act became law, on 1 January<br />

1973, Britain joined the European Economic Community. This meant that<br />

an additional 200 million people were to have the right freely to enter and<br />

to settle in Britain. Although concern was expressed in some quarters that<br />

this might lead to an overwhelming invasion of Spanish and Portuguese<br />

waiters (which of course did not occur), there was virtually no populist or<br />

racist opposition to this innovation.<br />

From 1971 onwards the Ugandan government under Idi Amin put<br />

pressure on people of Asian descent to leave Uganda, and in 1972 it expelled<br />

most of them. Under the Labour government’s 1968 Act the Conservative<br />

government of Edward Heath could have kept them all, or virtually all, out<br />

of Britain. It decided instead to persuade other governments to take as many<br />

as possible and to allow the rest to enter Britain. 23,000 Ugandan Asians,<br />

mostly the best qualified, went to Canada and other countries. 29,000 came<br />

to Britain, where the government made a mainly unsuccessful attempt to<br />

disperse them away from existing areas of Asian settlement. As a result of<br />

this and of continuing family reunion, the Asian population in Britain<br />

continued to grow. Immigration of Indians from East Africa and from India<br />

increased to a peak of 40,000 in 1972 and continued at around 20,000 a<br />

year for the rest of the 1970s; immigration from Pakistan was about 10,000<br />

a year in the 1970s. Immigration from the Caribbean, on the other hand,<br />

declined from about 5,000 a year in the 1960s to almost nothing by the<br />

1970s. By the 1990s there was net emigration by Caribbeans.<br />

In government in the 1970s Labour introduced no new controls, and it<br />

appeared to have some second thoughts on their effects. There was some<br />

recognition that the rushed introduction of the 1968 Commonwealth<br />

Immigrants Act had set back Labour’s attempts to improve race relations,<br />

and that its unexpected defeat in the 1970 general election might have had<br />

something to do with its failure to counter Enoch Powell. In 1972 a subcommittee<br />

of the party’s national executive committee produced a green<br />

paper which recognised that increasing the severity of immigration controls<br />

only led to demands for more of them, or even for complete bans on<br />

immigration. In opposition in the 1980s, the Labour Party, influenced by<br />

anti-deportation campaigns and believing there would be few immigrants<br />

when unemployment was so high, undertook to repeal the various<br />

immigration acts.<br />

The Tories’ election victory in 1979, on the other hand, followed the<br />

espousal by Margaret Thatcher of some of the rhetoric of the neo-fascist<br />

National Front, as well as other right-wing and anti-union rhetoric. On 30<br />

January 1978, Mrs Thatcher was interviewed on ITV’s World in Action. She<br />

expressed sympathy with people who felt immigration was too high and who<br />

were ‘really rather afraid that this country might be rather swamped by<br />

people with a different culture’. ‘If you want good race relations,’ she said,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!