19.05.2013 Views

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Border Controls 53<br />

middle class there. Some of them had opted for British rather than local<br />

citizenship when the East African colonies became independent. The 1962<br />

Act therefore did not apply to them. When in 1967 the Kenyan government<br />

passed legislation restricting Asians with British citizenship to temporary<br />

residence, a campaign started, led by Enoch Powell and Duncan Sandys, to<br />

ensure that they did not exercise their right to come to Britain. Like the fears<br />

aroused by the threat of controls in 1961, this had the effect of speeding up<br />

the exodus; 10,000, mainly skilled and middle-class, Kenyan Asians entered<br />

Britain in February 1968. This was considered to constitute a crisis. In<br />

March 1968 the Labour government rushed a second Commonwealth<br />

Immigrants Act through parliament. The act subjected all holders of United<br />

Kingdom passports to immigration controls unless they, a parent or a<br />

grandparent had been born, adopted or naturalised in the United Kingdom.<br />

The 1968 act left about 200,000 Kenyan Asians with largely valueless<br />

passports and in effect stateless, in spite of the promises made to them at the<br />

time of independence. As a concession the government introduced a voucher<br />

scheme which would allow in 1,500 Kenyan Asians and their families per<br />

year. But it also introduced new restrictions on the family members of Commonwealth<br />

citizens.<br />

The introduction of the act was opposed by the Commonwealth secretary,<br />

George Thomson, who is minuted in the Cabinet papers of 15 February 1968<br />

(quoted in the Newsletter of the National Coalition of Anti-Deportation<br />

Campaigns of October–December 1999) as follows:<br />

Although he recognised the problems that would be created by a continued inflow of<br />

a large number of Asians from Kenya, to pass such legislation would be wrong in<br />

principle, clearly discriminatory on grounds of colour and contrary to everything we<br />

stood for. ... We should effectively deprive large numbers of people of any citizenship<br />

at all or, at best, turn them into second class citizens.<br />

Thomson’s arguments were overruled by the prime minister, James<br />

Callaghan, who concluded in a memo of 21 February 1968 that:<br />

We must bear in mind that the problem is potentially much wider than East Africa.<br />

There are another one and a quarter million people not subject to our immigration<br />

control. ... At some future time we may be faced with an influx from Aden or Malaysia.<br />

The 1968 Commonwealth Immigrants Act threatened to scupper the government’s<br />

new Race Relations Act and the efforts to promote legislation<br />

against racial discrimination by the Labour Home Secretary Roy Jenkins,<br />

who had said in 1966 in a speech to the Institute of Race Relations that he<br />

was ‘glad that we appear to have put behind us the sterile debate about the<br />

precise level of the flow of immigration’ (quoted in Deakin; speech reprinted<br />

in Race, vol. VIII, no. 3, January 1967). Racism had finally become blatant<br />

in the operation of immigration controls.<br />

Far from keeping the racists quiet, the act was followed a month later by<br />

Enoch Powell’s ‘rivers of blood’ speech. Powell was at the time a member of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!