19.05.2013 Views

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

Open%20borders%20The%20case%20against%20immigration%20controls%20-%20Teresa%20Hayter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Refugees: Tightening the Screw 115<br />

subject of threats and complaints. At Büren, the ‘Schaukelfesslung’ treatment has<br />

not even been outlawed or excluded from being used in the future.<br />

... people have committed suicide while detained prior to expulsion.<br />

There have also been several rebellions, some of them ‘veritable insurrections<br />

lasting for weeks’, in which especially Kurds and Algerians were<br />

involved, and there have been hunger strikes at airport detention zones.<br />

The FASTI conference was also told, by a participant from Zurich, that in<br />

Switzerland 5,000 people were detained in 1995 for varying lengths of time<br />

in prisons prior to deportation. In 1997 a special centre for deportation prior<br />

to removal was opened. People in this centre were ‘subjected to big<br />

pressures’: ‘They are beaten to make them confess what country they come<br />

from and what their true name is. We know of cases where people have been<br />

shoved onto aeroplanes, bound with wire and drugged.’ Sweden has kept<br />

asylum seekers in detention on ships, as Britain did Tamils in an earlier<br />

period, and confines some refugees on tents. By 1997 it had four detention<br />

centres, in which people may be held for eight or nine months. In the<br />

Netherlands, according to Rens den Hollander of the Autonoom Centrum in<br />

Amsterdam, more than 1,000 detention cells have been created in special<br />

prisons for refugees and ‘irregular’ foreigners. Two new ‘mega’ prisons were<br />

being built, and there were plans for an expansion of capacity to 2,000<br />

places. Normal prison and police stations were also used; the latter have no<br />

facilities to receive visitors. And there are reception centres at the airport and<br />

at land frontiers, where decisions are made in 24 hours and may be followed<br />

by transfer to detention. In addition, although moves to surround reception<br />

centres, or open camps, with high fences were thwarted by protesters, every<br />

effort is made to deter asylum seekers from going out; if they do, they are<br />

electronically monitored. There is no time limit to detention. This, and the<br />

lack of any organised activities or adequate medical attention, leads to disorientation<br />

and depression among detainees. ‘Once’, said Rens den<br />

Hollander, ‘I brought a dead leaf to a detainee to give him the sense of<br />

seasons’ passing that he had lost. Not allowed! Regulations!’ Standard<br />

punishment for any form of protest is two weeks in an isolation cell. Many are<br />

released, with no change in their circumstances and sometimes after many<br />

months in detention. Rens den Hollander commented:<br />

These detention centres are part of a real exclusion machine. For detention is an<br />

instrument of deterrence much more than it is an efficient means of control. In the<br />

Netherlands, 50 per cent of detainees are not removed from the country but are simply<br />

thrown onto the street, where they find themselves once more in a condition of<br />

illegality, after spending months and months in prison. The period of detention is<br />

unlimited. It is a kind of administrative detention. This detention of refugees and<br />

‘irregulars’ is supposed to send a signal to potential immigrants – ‘Don’t come here’<br />

– and to the governments of their countries of origin, to apply diplomatic pressure on<br />

them to take back their nationals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!