04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

486 The type-IIB superstring <strong>and</strong> type-II T duality<br />

we will find a non-perturbative strong–weak-coupling relation between the type-I SO(32)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the heterotic SO(32) superstring theories.<br />

17.1 N = 2B, d = 10 supergravity in the string frame<br />

The fields of N = 2B, d = 10 SUEGRA [571, 820, 823] associated with the massless<br />

modes of the type-IIB superstring are given in Table 14.2. Actually, as we have mentioned<br />

afew times, there are two N = 2B, d = 10 theories, with all fermionic chiralities reversed<br />

<strong>and</strong> opposite self-duality properties of the RR 5-form field strength. Here we are going to<br />

describe the theory with a RR 4-form Ĉ (4) + with self-dual 5-form field strength (suppressing<br />

the upper index + for convenience),<br />

ˆG (5) =+ ⋆ ˆG (5)<br />

(17.1)<br />

(all the RR field strengths are normalized as explained in Section 16.1.3 according to<br />

Eqs. (16.51) <strong>and</strong> (16.52), the only difference being the use of calligraphic letters for the<br />

NSNS fields ˆj ˆµˆν, ˆB ˆµˆν, <strong>and</strong> ˆϕ) <strong>and</strong> negative-chirality pairs of gravitinos <strong>and</strong> supersymmetry<br />

transformation parameters ˆζ<br />

i (−)<br />

ˆµ <strong>and</strong> ˆε i (−) <strong>and</strong> positive-chirality dilatinos ˆχ i (+) (although<br />

we also suppress these ± <strong>and</strong> the i = 1, 2 indices of the SO(2) global symmetry that rotates<br />

the fermions for convenience):<br />

ˆƔ11 ˆζ ˆµ =−ˆζ ˆµ, ˆƔ11ˆε =−ˆε, ˆƔ11 ˆχ =+ˆχ. (17.2)<br />

Although the self-duality equation for ˆG (5) looks like a constraint, it is indeed one of the<br />

equations of motion of the theory [820], <strong>and</strong> it arises as such in the superspace formalism<br />

[571]. It is not hard to see that, combined with the Bianchi identity, it gives a conventionallooking<br />

equation of motion:<br />

∂ ˆG (5) − 10<br />

3 ˆH ˆG (3) = 0 ⇒ ∂ ⋆ ˆG (5) − 10<br />

3 ˆH ˆG (3) = 0. (17.3)<br />

It is known that it is not possible to write a covariant action for the above self-duality<br />

equation of motion [685]. Nevertheless, having an action is very useful (for instance, to<br />

perform dimensional reductions) <strong>and</strong> we would like to write one. The main observation is<br />

that, if we do away with the self-duality of the 5-form, we can find an action that gives<br />

the conventional equation of motion Eq. (17.3) [111]. This equation of motion does not<br />

imply self-duality when it is combined with the Bianchi identity, but only ∂ ˆG (5) = ∂⋆ ˆG (5) .<br />

However, it is consistent with self-duality. This should be reflected in the following property<br />

of the action: if we dualize the 4-form, we must end up with an identical action written in<br />

terms of the dual 4-form. In other words, the action of the theory of the non-self-dual (NSD)<br />

5-form must itself be “Poincaréself-dual.” In our conventions the action of such a Poincaré<br />

self-dual NSD theory is<br />

SNSD =<br />

ˆg 2 B<br />

16πG (10)<br />

<br />

d<br />

NB<br />

10 ˆx <br />

−2 ˆϕ |ˆj| e ˆR( ˆj)− 4 ∂ ˆϕ <br />

2 1<br />

+ ˆH 2<br />

2 · 3!<br />

+ 1<br />

<br />

ˆG 2<br />

(0)<br />

2 + 1<br />

<br />

ˆG<br />

2 · 3!<br />

(3)<br />

2 + 1<br />

<br />

ˆG<br />

4 · 5!<br />

(5)<br />

2 − 1 1<br />

ɛ∂Ĉ<br />

192 |ˆj| (4) ∂Ĉ (2) <br />

ˆB ,<br />

(17.4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!