04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

608 Appendix A<br />

A.4.1 H-covariant derivatives<br />

The H-covariant derivative of any object that transforms contravariantly, φ ′ = Ɣr(h)φ, or<br />

covariantly, ψ ′ = ψƔr(h −1 ) (for instance, u(x) itself), in the representation r of H is<br />

Dµφ ≡ ∂µφ − ϑµ i Ɣr(Mi)φ, Dµψ ≡ ∂µψ + ψϑµ i Ɣr(Mi). (A.122)<br />

The curvature Fi is<br />

F i = dϑ i − 1<br />

2ϑ j ∧ ϑ k f jk i<br />

(A.123)<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is covariantly constant with respect to the full (Lorentz-plus-gauge) covariant derivative<br />

if we use the torsional spin connection Eq. (A.118) <strong>and</strong> also in the symmetric case.<br />

This statement is clearly equivalent to the covariant constancy of the Lorentz curvature.<br />

This implies that, in any reductive coset space G/H, there is a solution of the Yang–Mills<br />

equations of motion for the group H in the curved geometry associated with the (torsionful)<br />

spin connection defined above. This result is implicitly or explicitly used in many places.<br />

The simplest example is provided by the coset manifold SU(2)/U(1), which gives a round<br />

2-sphere. The U(1) connection solves the Maxwell equations <strong>and</strong> corresponds to the Dirac<br />

monopole (see the calculation of the Robinson–Bertotti superalgebra on page 386 <strong>and</strong> Appendix<br />

C.1).<br />

The gauge field ϑi is invariant under the combination of the diffeomorphisms generated<br />

by the Killing vectors k(I ) <strong>and</strong> gauge transformations generated by WI i , i.e.<br />

is the st<strong>and</strong>ard Lie derivative.<br />

−Lk(I ) ϑi = DµWI i , (A.124)<br />

where Lk(I )<br />

The H-covariant Lie derivative with respect to the Killing vectors17 k(I ) of contravariant<br />

(φ)orcovariant (ψ) objects in the representation r of H is<br />

Lk(I ) φ ≡ Lk(I ) φ + WI i Ɣr(Mi)φ, Lk(I ) ψ ≡ Lk(I ) ψ − ψWI i Ɣr(Mi). (A.125)<br />

This Lie derivative satisfies, among other properties<br />

[Lk(I ) , Lk(J) ] = L[k(I ),k(J)], (A.126)<br />

Lk(I ) ea = 0, (A.127)<br />

Lk(I ) u = Lk(I ) u − uWI i Mi = TI u, (A.128)<br />

where the last property follows from Eqs. (A.115) <strong>and</strong> (A.112). The connection 1-forms<br />

ϑ i are not covariant or contravariant objects <strong>and</strong> this definition does not apply to them.<br />

The best one can do for them is to combine the st<strong>and</strong>ard Lie derivative <strong>and</strong> a compensating<br />

gauge transformation. The resulting operator acting on ϑ i is identically zero, due to<br />

Eq. (A.124).<br />

17 H-covariant Lie derivatives can be defined with respect to any vector, but the property Eq. (A.126) holds<br />

only for Killing vectors. The spinorial Lie derivative [632, 633, 655] <strong>and</strong> the more general Lie–Lorentz<br />

<strong>and</strong> Lie–Maxwell derivatives that appear in calculations of supersymmetry algebras [390, 748] discussed<br />

in Section 13.2.1 can actually be seen as particular examples of this more general operator (see e.g. [460])<br />

<strong>and</strong>, actually, are identical objects when they are acting on Killing spinors of maximally supersymmetric<br />

spacetimes [25].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!