04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 <strong>Gravity</strong> as a self-consistent massless spin-2 SRFT 87<br />

There are two types of terms: terms of the form ∂k∂k <strong>and</strong> of the form k∂µ∂νk, which<br />

give finite contributions, <strong>and</strong> terms of the form k∂ 2 k, which give singular contributions<br />

(∂ 2 k ∼ δ (3) (x3))but only at the origin x3 = 0 <strong>and</strong> have to be absorbed into a renormalization<br />

of the source. In the Rosenfeld case, it is just a renormalization of the mass, but in the<br />

second case the mass is not renormalized <strong>and</strong>, instead, the source’s energy–momentum<br />

tensor has singular terms Tsource ij ∼ δijδ (3) (x3), which do not fit within the concept of a<br />

point-particle. Since we are mainly interested in obtaining corrections to the gravitational<br />

field of massive, finite-sized bodies of spherical symmetry (the Sun, for instance), we opt<br />

for hiding this problem in the closet with the other skeletons for the moment <strong>and</strong> simply<br />

ignore these terms.<br />

By taking the derivatives on the r.h.s. of the above expressions, we find<br />

1 (0)<br />

t Ros 00<br />

c (h(0) ) = 7 R<br />

2<br />

2 S<br />

χ 2<br />

1<br />

,<br />

|x3| 4<br />

1 (0)<br />

t Ros ij<br />

c (h(0) ) =− R2 S<br />

χ 2<br />

x i x j<br />

1 (0)<br />

t GR 00<br />

c (h(0) ) = 3 R<br />

2<br />

2 S<br />

χ 2<br />

1<br />

,<br />

|x3| 2<br />

1 (0)<br />

t GR ij<br />

c (h(0) ) = 7 R2 S<br />

χ 2<br />

1<br />

−<br />

|x3| 6 2 δij<br />

x i x j<br />

1<br />

−<br />

|x3| 6 2 δij<br />

1<br />

|x3| 4<br />

1<br />

|x3| 4<br />

<br />

,<br />

<br />

.<br />

(3.210)<br />

To solve these equations, we could try to eliminate all the off-diagonal terms in the<br />

energy–momentum tensor by a gauge transformation, as did Thirring in [888]. However, as<br />

observed in [725], the gauge transformation that one has to use is ɛµ ∼ ∂µ ln r, which does<br />

not go to zero at infinity <strong>and</strong>, furthermore, takes us out of the De Donder gauge in which<br />

we want to solve the equation. This clearly invalidates Thirring’s results.<br />

However, we can solve directly the first of Eqs. (3.207) in the De Donder gauge: observe<br />

that the r.h.s. of this equation,<br />

∂ 2 ¯h (1) µν = 1<br />

c t (0) µν(h (0) ), (3.211)<br />

is divergence-free. For the Rosenfeld energy–momentum tensor we obtain [725]<br />

¯h (1) 00 =− 7 R<br />

4<br />

2 S<br />

χ 2<br />

1<br />

, ¯h<br />

|x3| 2<br />

(1) ij =− 1 R<br />

4<br />

2 S<br />

χ 2<br />

xi x j<br />

, (3.212)<br />

|x3| 4<br />

<strong>and</strong>, by combining this correction <strong>and</strong> the linear term into gµν = ηµν + χh (0) µν + χ 2h (1) µν,<br />

we obtain the spherically symmetric metric<br />

ds 2 Ros =<br />

<br />

1 − RS<br />

r − R2 S<br />

r 2<br />

<br />

c 2 dt 2 <br />

− 1 + RS<br />

r + R2 S<br />

r 2<br />

<br />

dr 2 <br />

− 1 + RS 3 R<br />

+<br />

r 4<br />

2 S<br />

r 2<br />

<br />

r 2 d 2 (2) ,<br />

(3.213)<br />

where we have defined r =|x3| <strong>and</strong> used dr = xi dxi /|x3|, dxidxi = dr2 + r 2d2 , etc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!