04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.2 The Einstein–Maxwell system 223<br />

<strong>and</strong>, using the antisymmetry of Fµν or d 2 = 0, it is trivial to see that, since the l.h.s. of the<br />

equation is divergence-free, the r.h.s. of the equation is also, for consistency, divergencefree,<br />

as we knew it had to be in order to preserve the gauge invariance of the action. This is<br />

no coincidence: the fact that the r.h.s. of the Maxwell equation is divergence-free is in fact<br />

the gauge identity associated with the invariance under δ Aµ = ∂µ,asweare going to see.<br />

Finally, using the Maxwell equation (8.47), we can rewrite the definition of the total<br />

electric charge Eq. (8.44) in terms of the field strength <strong>and</strong> again use Stokes’ theorem. If<br />

the boundary of a constant-time slice has the topology of a S 2 at infinity, we obtain<br />

<br />

q =<br />

S2 ⋆F. (8.48)<br />

∞<br />

which is a useful definition of the total electric charge of a spacetime in terms of the field<br />

strength (the electric flux) <strong>and</strong> which we will generalize further in Part III.<br />

This is the kind of formula that we will use because in the Einstein–Maxwell system<br />

there are no fields explicitly written that act as sources for Aµ. Just as in the case of the<br />

Maxwell equations in vacuum, we can obtain solutions describing the field of charges.<br />

These solutions are singular near the place where the charge ought to be <strong>and</strong> the solution is<br />

not a solution there (there are no charges explicitly included in the system). However, the<br />

above expression allows us to calculate the charge that ought to be placed there to produce<br />

the flux of electromagnetic field that we observe. 10 We have introduced sources as a device<br />

for underst<strong>and</strong>ing the definition.<br />

We could also have used the invariance of the Einstein–Maxwell action to find the conserved<br />

Noether current <strong>and</strong> define the electric charge through it.<br />

We studied the invariance of the Maxwell action <strong>and</strong> found the corresponding Noether<br />

current in Minkowski spacetime in Section 3.2.1. The coupling to gravity introduces only<br />

minor changes <strong>and</strong> the conclusion is, again, that the electric charge can be defined by<br />

Eq. (8.48).<br />

It is useful to consider a simple example of a source: the current associated with a particle<br />

of electric charge q <strong>and</strong> worldline γ parametrized by X µ (ξ).Inamanifestly covariant form<br />

it is given by<br />

j µ <br />

µ 1<br />

(x) = qc dX √ δ<br />

γ |g| (4) [x − X (ξ)], (8.49)<br />

where dX µ = dξdX µ /dξ. Onmaking the choice ξ = X 0 <strong>and</strong> integrating over X 0 ,we<br />

obtain<br />

j µ (x 0 <br />

, x) = qc<br />

=−qc dXµ<br />

dx 0<br />

0 dXµ<br />

dX<br />

dX0 1<br />

√ δ<br />

|g| (3) (x − X)δ(x 0 − X 0 )<br />

δ (3) [x − X(x 0 )]<br />

√ . (8.50)<br />

|g|<br />

10 Of course, this is just a covariant generalization of the Gauss theorem that relates the flux of electric field<br />

through a closed surface to the charge enclosed by it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!