04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

Noether’s theorems<br />

In the next chapter, we are going to introduce general relativity as the result of the construction<br />

of a self-consistent special-relativistic field theory (SRFT) of gravity. In this construction,<br />

gauge symmetry <strong>and</strong> the energy–momentum tensor will play a key role. In this<br />

chapter we want to review Noether’s theorems, the relation between global symmetries <strong>and</strong><br />

conserved charges, <strong>and</strong> the relation between local symmetries <strong>and</strong> gauge identities. We will<br />

define the canonical energy–momentum tensor as the conserved Noether current associated<br />

with the invariance under constant translations <strong>and</strong> we will review several ways of improving<br />

it that are associated with invariance under other spacetime transformations (Lorentz<br />

rotations <strong>and</strong> rescalings). Finally, we will relate these improved energy–momentum tensors<br />

to the energy–momentum tensor used in general relativity.<br />

2.1 Equations of motion<br />

Let us consider an action S[ϕ] for a generic field ϕ, which may have (spacetime or internal)<br />

indices that we do not exhibit for the sake of simplicity. Allowing for Lagrangians<br />

containing higher derivatives of ϕ,wewrite the action as follows:<br />

<br />

S[ϕ] = d d x L(ϕ, ∂ϕ, ∂ 2 ϕ,...). (2.1)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

In most cases, L is a scalar density under the relevant spacetime transformations (Poincaré<br />

transformations in SRFTs <strong>and</strong> general coordinate transformations in general-covariant theories).<br />

It is also possible to use a Lagrangian that is a scalar density up to a total derivative, 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus we will make absolutely no assumptions about the transformation properties of<br />

the Lagrangian L.<br />

Under arbitrary infinitesimal variations of the field variable δϕ<br />

<br />

δS = d d <br />

x δL = d d <br />

∂L ∂L<br />

x δϕ +<br />

∂ϕ ∂∂µϕ δ∂µϕ + ∂L<br />

∂∂µ∂νϕ δ∂µ∂νϕ<br />

<br />

+ ··· . (2.2)<br />

1 For instance, in general relativity one may want to eliminate the piece of the Lagrangian with second derivatives,<br />

which is a total derivative, but then the rest is not a scalar density.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!