04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

588 String black holes in four <strong>and</strong> five dimensions<br />

• x 78 = 1 √ 2 Z (0) corresponds to D0 charge,<br />

• y 78 =− 1 √ 2 Z (6)<br />

123456 corresponds to a D6 wrapped on T6 ,<br />

• xi7 = 1<br />

5! √ 2 ɛijklmnZ (5)<br />

jklmn correspond to S5As wrapped on jklmn,<br />

• x i8 = 1<br />

√ 2 p i correspond to KK momentum in the directions i,<br />

• yi7 = 1<br />

5! √ 2 ɛ(i) jklmn Z (6)<br />

ric direction i, <strong>and</strong><br />

jklmn(i)<br />

correspond to KK6As wrapped on jklmn with isomet-<br />

• y i8 = 1<br />

√ 2 Z (1) i correspond to F1s wrapped in the directions i.<br />

The d = 4extremal BH that we have constructed corresponds to x 18 = (1/ √ 2)NW,<br />

y 16 = (1/ √ 2)ND2, x 67 = (1/ √ 2)NS5, <strong>and</strong> y 78 =−(1/ √ 2)ND6, <strong>and</strong> the diamond formula<br />

immediately gives the right value for the entropy. The dual configurations give exactly the<br />

same result. In fact, the above identification between entries of the central-charge matrix<br />

<strong>and</strong> charges of extended objects is clearly not unique, but is defined only up to U-duality<br />

rotations. We can also look at it from a different point of view: the objects we have considered<br />

are all wrapped on T 6 <strong>and</strong> are T dual to each other <strong>and</strong>, essentially, they cannot be<br />

distinguished from the d = 4central-matrix point of view. Their masses may be different<br />

if they are related by S dualities, though. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, since U duality acts on the<br />

moduli, too, we have to use the description in which compactification radii are bigger than<br />

the critical self-dual radius <strong>and</strong> the coupling constant is small.<br />

It would be very interesting to have explicitly the most general U-duality-invariant BHtype<br />

solutions of these theories consistent with the no-hair theorems, which would be similar<br />

to the SWIP solutions of pure N = 4, d = 4 SUEGRA that we studied in Section 12.2.1<br />

to check these formulae, but obtaining them turns out to be an extremely difficult problem.<br />

A simpler problem consists in finding a generating solution that would give the general solution<br />

when we act on it with a general U-duality transformation, which would preserve the<br />

metric. Simple arguments [75, 271] tell us that such solutions must have, respectively, four<br />

<strong>and</strong> five independent charge parameters in d = 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 dimensions. It is not hard to find<br />

brane configurations with these parameters <strong>and</strong> generating solutions have been proposed in<br />

[144, 145].<br />

20.3 Entropy from microstate counting<br />

In the previous section we constructed BH solutions of maximal d = 4, 5 SUEGRA <strong>and</strong><br />

identified the N = 2A/B, d = 10 SUEGRA solutions they originate from. In the extreme<br />

cases, we identified unambiguously their “components,” which places us in the upper-lefth<strong>and</strong><br />

box of Figure 20.1, <strong>and</strong> allows us to move clockwise in the figure <strong>and</strong> calculate the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!