04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.4 Tangent space 19<br />

For more general tensors one has to add a curvature (ω) term for each flat index <strong>and</strong> a curvature<br />

(Ɣ) term for each world index. The curvatures have the same form as in Eqs. (1.27)<br />

<strong>and</strong> (1.81) but now Rµν ab is antisymmetric in ab.<br />

The following expression is sometimes used:<br />

Rab =−∂aωc c b − ∂cωab c + ωcdaω dc b + ωabdωc cd . (1.95)<br />

The Vielbein formalism allows us to study the Weitzenböck spacetime defined on<br />

page 11.<br />

1.4.1 Weitzenböck spacetime Ad<br />

This spacetime is defined by a metric-compatible connection that we denote by Wµν ρ <strong>and</strong><br />

call the Weitzenböck connection [944, 945] whose Riemann curvature is identically zero,<br />

Rµνρ σ (W ) = 0. Trying to solve this equation directly for W = 0isavery difficult task.<br />

However, we can use the Vielbein formalism to find a solution. Let us denote by Ws µ ab the<br />

tangent-space connection associated with W via the first Vielbein postulate<br />

∇µe a ν = ∂µe a ν − Wµν a + Ws µν a = 0. (1.96)<br />

The curvature of Ws is obviously zero on account of Eq. (1.85). Now, however, we can<br />

use the trivial solution to the equation Rµν ab (Ws) = 0, namely Ws = 0, because, according<br />

to the above relation, Ws = 0 does not imply W = 0but<br />

Wµν ρ = ea ρ ∂µe a ν. (1.97)<br />

This is the Weitzenböck connection whose curvature vanishes identically. It cannot be<br />

rewritten in terms of the metric: it is necessary to use the Vielbein formalism. Observe<br />

that, using this connection, we can write the relation between any two connections Ɣ <strong>and</strong><br />

ω satisfying the first Vielbein postulate in the form<br />

Ɣµν ρ = Wµν ρ + ωµν ρ . (1.98)<br />

ωµν ρ is a tensor, but Ɣµν ρ is not (it is an affine connection), <strong>and</strong> responsible for this is<br />

the Weitzenböck connection Wµν ρ .Wecan also write<br />

ωµ ab = Ɣµ ab − Wµ ab , Wµ ab = e aν ∂µe b ν. (1.99)<br />

Now Ɣµ ab is a GL(d, R) tensor in the upper two indices whereas ωµ ab is not (because<br />

it is a GL(d, R) connection). Again, the Weitzenböck connection Wµ ab is responsible for<br />

this.<br />

Even though we have to search explicitly for a metric-compatible connection to find W ,<br />

it is easy to check that it is indeed metric-compatible. Then, it can be decomposed into the<br />

sum of the Levi-Cività connection <strong>and</strong> the contorsion tensor. The torsion tensor is<br />

<strong>and</strong>, therefore, the contorsion tensor is given by<br />

Tµν ρ =−2µν ρ , (1.100)<br />

Kµνρ(W ) = µνρ − νρµ + ρµν =−ωµνρ(e), (1.101)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!