04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

304 The Kaluza–Klein black hole<br />

dimension does not have to go to −1 atinfinity but can be any real negative number. If the<br />

metric is asymptotically flat in the non-compact directions then the dimensionally reduced<br />

metric (assuming that the compact dimension is isometric) will be asymptotically flat in the<br />

KK conformal frame <strong>and</strong> the value of k at infinity will be some positive real number k0.<br />

When we rescale the metric to go to the Einstein conformal frame, the metric does not<br />

look asymptotically flat any longer, but<br />

<strong>and</strong> a change of coordinates is necessary:<br />

lim<br />

r→∞ gE µν = k 2<br />

x µ → x ′µ = k 1<br />

d−2<br />

0 x µ , ⇒ gE µν → g ′ E µν<br />

d−2<br />

0 ηµν, (11.51)<br />

2<br />

d−2<br />

= k−<br />

0<br />

gE µν<br />

r ′ →∞<br />

−→ ηµν. (11.52)<br />

Thus, if we start with ˆd-dimensional metrics that are asymptotically flat in the noncompact<br />

dimensions, we are forced to perform a rescaling of the coordinates, which is, at<br />

the very least, quite unusual. Of course, this change of coordinates, does not modify the<br />

action Eq. (11.45).<br />

We could have decided to start with ˆd-dimensional metrics, which naturally lead to<br />

asymptotically flat Einstein metrics with no need for changes of coordinates, but this looks<br />

rather artificial.<br />

As we pointed out before, a very interesting aspect of the massless sector of the KK theory<br />

is that the truncated massive modes reappear as solitonic solutions. A further problem<br />

of the st<strong>and</strong>ard Einstein conformal frame is that the masses one finds for solitons are not<br />

the ones expected in the spectrum of Kaluza–Klein theories. We are going to check this<br />

explicitly in Section 11.2.3.<br />

The prescription we have used to go to the Einstein frame is not canonical, though. We<br />

just wanted to eliminate the unconventional (local) factor of k in front of the curvature<br />

scalar <strong>and</strong> the conformal factor that does the job is unique only up to an overall constant<br />

1<br />

factor. In particular, we could have rescaled the KK metric by the factor ˜<br />

−<br />

= (k/k0) d−2<br />

which defines the modified Einstein conformal frame<br />

2<br />

−<br />

gµν = (k/k0) d−2 ˜gE µν. (11.53)<br />

One of the main characteristics of this metric is that it is invariant under the scale transformations<br />

Eq. (11.29). It is appropriate to use with it fields that are also invariant under<br />

those rescalings:<br />

õ = k0 Aµ, ˜k = k/k0. (11.54)<br />

In terms of these scale-invariant fields, the action takes the form<br />

˜SE = 2πℓk0<br />

16πG ( <br />

ˆd)<br />

N<br />

d d x <br />

|˜gE| ˜RE +<br />

d − 1<br />

2 ˜k<br />

−2<br />

∂ ˜k<br />

d − 2<br />

− 1<br />

d−1<br />

˜k<br />

2 d−2 ˜F 4 2<br />

<br />

, (11.55)<br />

which is identical to the action in the original “Einstein frame” Eq. (11.45) except for the<br />

overall factor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!