04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where<br />

2.2 Noether’s theorems 29<br />

j µ<br />

N1 (˜δ) =−s µ (˜δ) + Tcan µ ν ˜δx ν − ∂L<br />

∂ρϕ∂ν ˜δx<br />

ρ<br />

∂∂µ∂νϕ<br />

<br />

∂L ∂L<br />

+ − ∂ν<br />

˜δϕ +<br />

∂∂µϕ ∂∂µ∂νϕ<br />

∂L<br />

∂∂µ∂νϕ ∂ν ˜δϕ + ···, (2.17)<br />

where, in turn,<br />

Tcan µ ν = η µ νL − ∂L<br />

∂∂µϕ ∂νϕ − ∂L<br />

∂∂µ∂ρϕ ∂ν∂ρϕ<br />

<br />

∂L<br />

+ ∂ρ ∂νϕ + ···. (2.18)<br />

∂∂µ∂ρϕ<br />

Tcan µ ν is the canonical energy–momentum tensor <strong>and</strong> is the only piece of j µ<br />

N1 that survives<br />

(apart from s µ ) when we consider constant ˜δx µ s.<br />

It is worth stressing that the total-derivative term will not vanish in general after use of<br />

Stokes’ theorem because the variations ˜δx µ <strong>and</strong> ˜δϕ do not vanish on the boundary.<br />

Now we want to derive conservation laws from this identity. We see that, in the general<br />

case, if the equations of motion δS/δϕ = 0 are satisfied, then we can conclude that j µ<br />

N1 (˜δ)<br />

is a conserved vector current (Noether current), i.e. satisfies the continuity equation<br />

∂µj µ<br />

N1 (˜δ) = 0. (2.19)<br />

Thus, for a theory that is exactly invariant under constant translations, the canonical<br />

energy–momentum tensor is the associated Noether conserved current.<br />

Strictly speaking j µ<br />

N1 (˜δ) is a vector density. In the presence of a metric, we can define a<br />

vector current j µ<br />

N1 (˜δ) = √ |g| j µ<br />

N1 (˜δ) <strong>and</strong> write the continuity equation in general-covariant<br />

form:<br />

∇µ j µ<br />

N1 (˜δ) = 0. (2.20)<br />

In Minkowski spacetime this distinction is unnecessary. Such terms are called “conserved”<br />

because they are used to define quantities (charges) that are conserved in time, as we will<br />

see next.<br />

This is the best we can do if the transformations are global, i.e. when they take the form<br />

˜δx µ ≡ σ I ˜δI x µ , ˜δϕ ≡ σ I ˜δI ϕ, (2.21)<br />

where ˜δI x µ <strong>and</strong> ˜δI ϕ are given functions of the coordinates <strong>and</strong> ϕ <strong>and</strong> the σ I , I = 1,...,n,<br />

are the constant transformation parameters. Then, we find n on-shell conserved currents<br />

j µ<br />

N1 I independent of the parameters σ I <strong>and</strong> they are given by<br />

j µ<br />

N1 I =−sµ (˜δI ) + Tcan µ ν ˜δI x ν − ∂L<br />

∂∂µ∂νϕ ∂ρϕ∂ν ˜δI x ρ<br />

<br />

∂L ∂L<br />

+ − ∂ν<br />

˜δI ϕ +<br />

∂∂µϕ ∂∂µ∂νϕ<br />

∂L<br />

∂∂µ∂νϕ ∂ν ˜δI ϕ + ···. (2.22)<br />

If the transformations are local, i.e. they depend on n local parameters σI (x), the generic<br />

result of the on-shell conservation of the current j µ<br />

N1 is still true,3 but wecan do more.<br />

3 In principle there is one current for each value of the local parameters. This gives an infinite number of<br />

on-shell conserved currents. However, only for a certain asymptotic behavior of the σI (x)s will the integrals<br />

defining the conserved charges converge. These asymptotic behaviors are usually associated with the global<br />

invariances of the vacuum configuration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!