04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

320 The Kaluza–Klein black hole<br />

which never goes to a (d − 2)-sphere with finite radius. However, we know that this solution<br />

corresponds to a solution with a regular horizon in d + 1dimensions! One possible way to<br />

explain what is happening here is the following: the results of the dimensional–reduction<br />

procedure are meaningful within certain approximations. In particular, we assume that the<br />

massive modes can be ignored because their masses are very large, which means that the<br />

compactification radius is small. In this geometry, the compactification radius, measured<br />

by the modulus k,isnot constant over the space but depends on r, blowing up when r → 0<br />

(the locus of the putative horizon). Thus, near this point, there are KK modes whose masses<br />

become small enough to be taken into account, but we have not done this <strong>and</strong> the solution<br />

cannot be considered valid near r = 0. Near r = 0 the solution is indeed ˆd-dimensional <strong>and</strong><br />

regular. Similar mechanisms have been proposed in other cases <strong>and</strong> in the context of string<br />

theory to show how some singularities disappear when we take into account the higherdimensional<br />

origin of the solution [441].<br />

Oxidation. Dimensional oxidation is in general a much simpler operation than reduction:<br />

we simply take a solution of the lower-dimensional theory <strong>and</strong> rewrite it in terms of the<br />

ˆd-dimensional fields, obtaining a solution of the higher-dimensional theory that does not<br />

depend on the compact coordinate. However, this solution may (but need not) be the zero<br />

mode of a solution that does depend periodically on the compact coordinate <strong>and</strong> in general<br />

we cannot know which of these possibilities is true.<br />

In any case, the first step consists in having a solution of the lower-dimensional theory<br />

<strong>and</strong> our problem is that the d-dimensional ERN solution (in general, the MP solutions)<br />

is not a solution of the dimensionally reduced ˆd = (d + 1)-dimensional Einstein–Maxwell<br />

theory. Let us examine the KK scalar equation of motion in the Einstein frame. It takes the<br />

form<br />

∇ 2 ln k ∼ c1k a1 F 2 + c2k a2 G 2 , (11.127)<br />

<strong>and</strong> requires a non-trivial k if F 2 = 0orG = 0, as is the case here. Thus, the MP solutions<br />

cannot, in general, be considered solutions of the reduced Einstein–Maxwell equations <strong>and</strong>,<br />

thus, cannot be dimensionally oxidized.<br />

There are, however, exceptions. For instance<br />

1. Solutions with F 2 = 0 satisfy the KK scalar equation of motion <strong>and</strong> thus can be<br />

oxidized to a purely gravitational solution. One example is the dyonic ERN BH with<br />

electric <strong>and</strong> magnetic charges related by p =±16πG (4)<br />

N q (see page 330). Another<br />

example is provided by electromagnetic pp-waves.<br />

2. We have seen in Section 11.2.5 that any solution of the four-dimensional Einstein–<br />

Maxwell theory (N = 2, d = 4 SUGRA) can be oxidized to a solution of N = 2, d =<br />

5 SUGRA using Eqs. (11.116) <strong>and</strong> we have mentioned that solutions of the latter can<br />

be further oxidized to N = (1, 0), d = 6SUGRA.<br />

Observe that we can oxidize the four-dimensional Einstein–Maxwell solutions with<br />

F 2 = 0intwodifferent ways to d = 5. The second form makes use of the supersymmetric<br />

structure of the theory <strong>and</strong> ensures that the supersymmetry properties will be preserved in<br />

the oxidation, whereas in the first case they will not.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!