04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 <strong>Gravity</strong> as a self-consistent massless spin-2 SRFT 89<br />

3.2.7 Deser’s argument<br />

In [299] Deser presented an argument that allows one to see GR as the self-consistent SRFT<br />

of a spin-2 particle we were looking for in the sense that, in GR, the gravitational field<br />

couples to its own energy–momentum tensor, at least for a certain choice of field variables,<br />

Lagrangian, <strong>and</strong> energy–momentum tensor. The emphasis is on physical consistency rather<br />

than on gauge-invariance, <strong>and</strong>, therefore, the choice of energy–momentum tensor is not<br />

based on that criterion, as in our previous discussions about the Noether method. These<br />

would be weak points if we wanted to take this work as proof of the uniqueness of GR as a<br />

solution to our initial problem, but we should underst<strong>and</strong> Deser’s work as a proof that GR<br />

is a solution to our problem from the physical st<strong>and</strong>point.<br />

The starting point in Deser’s argument is a first-order version of the Fierz–Pauli action<br />

that uses two (off-shell) independent fields ϕ µν <strong>and</strong> Ɣµν ρ (see [841] for a construction of<br />

this action),<br />

S (1)<br />

FP [ϕµν ,Ɣµν ρ ] = 1<br />

χ 2<br />

<br />

d d x −χϕ µν 2∂[µƔρ]ν ρ + η µν 2Ɣλ[µ ρ Ɣρ]ν λ , (3.221)<br />

which are Lorentz tensors symmetric in the pair of indices µν. This action is invariant up<br />

to a total derivative under the gauge transformations<br />

δɛϕµν =−2∂(µɛν) + ηµν∂ρɛ ρ , δɛƔµνρ =−χ∂µ∂νɛρ, (3.222)<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is equivalent on-shell to the Fierz–Pauli action because it gives the same equations<br />

of motion: the equations of motion of the fields ϕ µν <strong>and</strong> Ɣµν ρ are<br />

χ δS(1)<br />

δϕ µν =−∂(µƔν)ρ ρ + ∂ρƔµν ρ = 0,<br />

2<br />

δS(1)<br />

χ<br />

δƔµν ρ = 2Ɣρ (µν) − η µν Ɣρλ λ − η τσ Ɣτσ (µ η ν) ρ − χ∂ρϕ µν + χηρ (µ ∂σ ϕ ν)σ = 0.<br />

The second equation is just a constraint for Ɣµν ρ .Oncontracting it with η ρσ ,weobtain<br />

(3.223)<br />

η ρσ Ɣρσ ν = χ∂λϕ λν , (3.224)<br />

<strong>and</strong>, on contracting instead with ηµν <strong>and</strong> using the last result, we find<br />

Ɣρλ λ =− 1<br />

d − 2 χ∂ρϕ, ϕ = ϕµ µ . (3.225)<br />

Using now these two last equations in the equation for Ɣµν ρ ,weobtain<br />

Ɣρµν + Ɣνρµ = χ∂ρhµν, hµν = ϕµν − 1<br />

d − 2 ηµνϕ. (3.226)<br />

In order to solve for Ɣ, weadd to this equation (ρµν) the permutation µνρ <strong>and</strong> subtract<br />

the permutation νρµ, obtaining, finally,<br />

Ɣρµν = 1<br />

2 χ{∂ρhµν + ∂µhνρ − ∂νhρµ}. (3.227)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!