04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 A perturbative introduction to general relativity<br />

3.2.1 Gauge invariance, gauge identities, <strong>and</strong> charge conservation<br />

in the SRFT of a spin-1 particle<br />

A massive or massless spin-1 particle is described by a vector field A µ . The simplest relativistic<br />

wave equation we could imagine for it would be<br />

∂ 2 + m 2 A µ = 0. (3.62)<br />

However, the energy density of this theory is not positive-definite unless one imposes the<br />

Lorentz or transversality condition<br />

∂µ A µ = 0. (3.63)<br />

Furthermore, just as in the spin-2-particle case, the vector A µ describes spin-1 helicity<br />

states but also spin-0 helicity states. A d-dimensional vector field has d independent<br />

components, but a massive spin-1 particle in d dimensions has d − 1 states (three in<br />

d = 4: sz =−1, 0, 1) <strong>and</strong> a massless spin-1 particle has d − 2 helicity states (two in d = 4:<br />

sz =−1, +1). It is precisely the unwanted spin-0 helicity states that contribute negatively<br />

to the energy <strong>and</strong> the Lorentz condition projects them out.<br />

If we couple the massless theory to charged matter, by Lorentz covariance, this has to be<br />

described by a vector current j µ ,sowehave<br />

∂ 2 A µ = j µ<br />

(3.64)<br />

<strong>and</strong>, by consistency with the Lorentz condition, the vector current has to be conserved,<br />

∂µ j µ = 0, which is, again, a physically meaningful condition that coincides with our experience<br />

with electric charges <strong>and</strong> currents.<br />

We would like to construct a theory in which the Lorentz condition arises as a consequence<br />

of the equation of motion in the massive case <strong>and</strong> in which ∂µ A µ is completely<br />

arbitrary in the massless case. These conditions guarantee the removal of the unwanted<br />

helicities. We expect the equation of motion to be of the form<br />

D µ (A) + m 2 A µ = j µ , (3.65)<br />

where, now, by consistency, the massless wave operator D µ (A) has to satisfy off-shell the<br />

identity<br />

∂µD µ (A) = 0, (3.66)<br />

which should arise as the gauge identity associated with some gauge symmetry.<br />

We could proceed as in [739], translating these conditions into a gauge identity for a<br />

general Lagrangian <strong>and</strong> then trying to find, with as much generality as possible, a gauge<br />

symmetry (forming a group) leading to that gauge identity. As is well known, the result is<br />

the Proca Lagrangian <strong>and</strong> equation of motion,<br />

<br />

S[A] = d d <br />

x − 1<br />

4 F 2 + m2<br />

2 A2<br />

<br />

,<br />

(3.67)<br />

where<br />

D µ<br />

(m) (A) = Dµ (A) + m 2 A µ = 0,<br />

D µ (A) ≡ ∂µF µν , Fµν = 2∂[µ Aν], (3.68)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!