04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.3 The positive-energy theorem 181<br />

with a matter energy–momentum tensor satisfying the dominant energy condition<br />

Tmatter µν kµnν ≥ 0, ∀ nµ, kµ non-spacelike, (6.46)<br />

is always non-negative, vanishing only for flat spacetime. This result was first obtained<br />

by Schoen <strong>and</strong> Yau in [830]. A new proof based on spinor techniques inspired by SUGRA<br />

was afterwards presented by Witten in [958] <strong>and</strong> subsequently by Nester in [719] <strong>and</strong> Israel<br />

<strong>and</strong> Nester in [596]. Previously, the positivity of mass in SUGRA <strong>and</strong> GR (as the bosonic<br />

part of N = 1 SUGRA) had been established in [310, 480]. Here we are going to use this<br />

Witten–Nester–Israel (WNI) technique because it can be generalized to more complicated<br />

cases <strong>and</strong> because it has a strong relation to supergravity that we will also use later on in<br />

Chapter 13.<br />

The positive-energy theorem is a very important result associated with the cosmiccensorship<br />

conjecture: inthe gravitational collapse of a star, the gravitational binding<br />

energy, which is negative, grows in absolute value. If the process continued indefinitely,<br />

the total energy of the collapsing star would become negative. However, according to the<br />

positive-mass theorem, this cannot happen <strong>and</strong> we expect a black-hole horizon to appear<br />

before the mass becomes negative.<br />

The WNI technique starts with the construction of the Nester 2-form E µν .Inthis case<br />

(pure d = 4 gravity; the extension to higher dimensions is straightforward) it is simply<br />

E µν (ɛ) =+ i<br />

2 ¯ɛγ µνρ ∇ρɛ + c.c., (6.47)<br />

where ɛ is a commuting Dirac spinor. The Nester form is manifestly real. Then, we define<br />

the integral I ,<br />

<br />

I (ɛ) =<br />

⋆<br />

E(ɛ), (6.48)<br />

∂<br />

where is a three-dimensional spacelike hypersurface (for instance, a constant time slice)<br />

whose boundary ∂ is a 2-sphere at infinity S2 ∞ . Observe that the Nester form can be<br />

rewritten in the form<br />

E µν (ɛ) =+i¯ɛγ µνρ <br />

∇ρɛ +∇ρ − i<br />

2 ¯ɛγ µνρ <br />

ɛ , (6.49)<br />

<strong>and</strong> only the first term contributes to I .<br />

The proof has two parts.<br />

1. Prove that, for suitably chosen spinors ɛ <strong>and</strong> Tmatter µν satisfying the dominant energy<br />

condition, I (ɛ) ≥ 0.<br />

2. Relate I (ɛ) to conserved charges.<br />

1. We use Stokes’ theorem<br />

<br />

⋆<br />

I (ɛ) = E(ɛ) =<br />

∂<br />

<br />

d ⋆ E(ɛ) =− 1<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

d 3 <br />

ν −i∇µ ¯ɛγ µνρ ∇ρɛ − i ¯ɛγ µνρ ∇µ∇ρɛ ,<br />

(6.50)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!