04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

322 The Kaluza–Klein black hole<br />

<strong>and</strong> keep only the zero mode −1/( √ 2πℓk0). The replacement of the δ function by its<br />

constant zero mode gives us the z-independent harmonic functions <strong>and</strong> metric, which can<br />

be immediately rewritten in terms of d-dimensional fields that we express both in the KK<br />

frame <strong>and</strong> in the modified Einstein frame for the interesting, asymptotically flat d > 4<br />

cases:<br />

ds 2 KK = H −1 dt 2 − d x 2<br />

d−1 ,<br />

d ˜s 2 E<br />

= H − d−3<br />

d−2 dt 2 − H 1<br />

d−2 d x 2<br />

d−1 ,<br />

Ãt = α(H −1 − 1), ˜k = H 1 2 , α =±1,<br />

H = 1 +<br />

h<br />

, h =<br />

|xd−1|<br />

d−3<br />

16πG ( ˆd)<br />

N pz<br />

2πℓk2 0 (d − 3)ω(d−2)<br />

.<br />

(11.131)<br />

This is the d-dimensional extreme electric KK BH solution. As expected, it describes a<br />

massive, electrically charged object that should be a KK mode. It does not have a regular<br />

horizon. It is clear that, had we started from the general family of pp-wave solutions<br />

Eqs. (10.42), we would have obtained a family of solutions of the same form but with arbitrary<br />

harmonic functions. Thus, we can construct solutions of the KK action Eq. (11.39)<br />

with several of these objects with charges of the same sign in static equilibrium by the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard procedure. Now, the equilibrium is more difficult to describe because a third interaction,<br />

mediated by the KK scalar k, comes into play. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in the reduction of<br />

the ERN solution we also found a solution describing a massive object charged with respect<br />

to a vector field <strong>and</strong> with a non-trivial scalar, but different from this one. The reason is that<br />

they obey different equations of motion, the difference being the strength with which the<br />

KK scalar couples to the vector field. We will study these dilaton “BHs” in more detail in<br />

Section 12.1.<br />

We can calculate the mass <strong>and</strong> charge of the above solutions to check that they do indeed<br />

correspond to those of a KK mode. From<br />

<strong>and</strong> the definition of the mass M,<br />

d−3<br />

− d − 3 h<br />

˜gE tt = H d−2 ∼ 1 − , (11.132)<br />

d − 2 |xd−1|<br />

d−3<br />

˜gE tt ∼ 1 − 16πG(d)<br />

N M<br />

(d − 2)ω(d−2)<br />

1<br />

, (11.133)<br />

|xd−1|<br />

d−3<br />

we find M = pzk −1<br />

0 ,asexpected.<br />

The electric charge can be calculated using the definition in Eqs. (11.63), finding first<br />

d−1<br />

˜k<br />

2 d−2 ⋆ ˜F =±(d − 3)h d d−2 , (11.134)<br />

where dd−2 is the unit (d − 2)-sphere volume form, whose integral over the sphere just<br />

gives ω(d−2) (see Appendix C). The final result is ˜q =±pzk −1<br />

0 (pz was taken to be positive),<br />

also as expected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!