04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 The Kaluza–Klein black hole<br />

What one would like to do now is to fix the value of this momentum, which completely<br />

determines the dynamics in the isometry direction, <strong>and</strong> find the effective dynamics in the<br />

remaining directions. Doing this in a general coordinate system is very complicated (if it is<br />

possible at all) <strong>and</strong> hence we have to work in adapted coordinates as before. We will use,<br />

then, all the machinery <strong>and</strong> notation developed in this section.<br />

In adapted coordinates the fact that there is a conserved momentum becomes evident<br />

since the action no longer depends on the isometric coordinate z.<br />

To simplify the problem further, we split the ˆd-dimensional fields <strong>and</strong> coordinates in<br />

terms of the d-dimensional ones according to Eq. (11.28), obtaining<br />

where the combination<br />

ˆS[X µ (ξ), Z(ξ), γ (ξ)] =− p<br />

<br />

2<br />

F(Z) = ˙Z + Aµ<br />

dξ γ − 1 <br />

2 gµν ˙X µ ˙X ν − k 2 F 2 (Z) , (11.73)<br />

˙X µ<br />

(11.74)<br />

that naturally appears in the action is the “field strength” of the extra worldline scalar Z,<br />

which now does not have a coordinate interpretation.<br />

As we explained, the original action (11.68) above is covariant under target-space diffeomorphisms<br />

<strong>and</strong> so must the action (11.73) be, since it is a simple rewriting of the former. In<br />

particular, it must be covariant under X µ -dependent shifts of the redundant coordinate Z,<br />

δZ =−(X µ ), (11.75)<br />

which do not take us out of our choice of coordinates (i.e. coordinates adapted to the isometry)<br />

either. As discussed before, these transformations generate gauge transformations of<br />

the U(1) gauge potential,<br />

δ Aµ = ∂µ. (11.76)<br />

The field strength of Z is covariant under this transformation, which justifies its definition.<br />

Related to the constant shifts of Z (which is an invariance) is the conservation of the<br />

momentum conjugate to Z,<br />

Pz ≡ ∂L<br />

∂ ˙Z = pγ − 1 2 F(Z), ˙Pz = 0. (11.77)<br />

Now we want to eliminate Z from the action completely, using its equation of motion<br />

( ˙Pz = 0), <strong>and</strong> thus obtain the action that governs the effective d-dimensional dynamics.<br />

However, we cannot simply substitute into the action Eq. (11.73) Pz = pγ 1 2 F(Z) =<br />

constant because from the resulting action one does not obtain the same equations of motion<br />

as one would from making the substitution into the equations of motion. The reason<br />

for this is that the equation of motion of Z is not algebraic because ˙Z occurs in the<br />

action.<br />

Aconsistent procedure by which to eliminate Z is to perform first the Legendre transformation<br />

of the Lagrangian with respect to the redundant coordinate Z, just as one would<br />

do to find the Hamiltonian if the Lagrangian depended only on Z. Weexpress ˙Z in terms

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!