04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

578 String black holes in four <strong>and</strong> five dimensions<br />

given mass M should agree. 2 The mass of a highly excited closed-string state is, according<br />

to Eqs. (14.46) <strong>and</strong> (14.48), M ∼ N 1 2 /ℓs, while, at the correspondence point, the Schwarzschild<br />

BH’s mass is M ∼ RS/(gℓs) 2 ∼ 1/(g 2 ℓs). Ifboth are the mass of the same object<br />

then g ∼ N − 1 4 .<br />

Let us now compute the entropy of this object in the string description <strong>and</strong> in the BH<br />

description at the correspondence point RS ∼ ℓs, g ∼ N − 1 4 . The BH entropy is<br />

S ∼ R 2 S /G(4)<br />

N ∼ g−2 ∼ √ N. (20.11)<br />

The string entropy is the logarithm of the degeneracy of states at the mass level M.<br />

String theories are a particular case of two-dimensional CFTs [455], which in general have<br />

an infinite spectrum of states. The degeneracy of states of a CFT characterized by a central<br />

charge c, for large values of the two-dimensional energy E, isgivenbyCardy’s formula,<br />

ρ(E) ∼ e √ π(c−24E0)EL/3 , (20.12)<br />

where E0 is the lowest energy <strong>and</strong> L the size of the spatial coordinate of the twodimensional<br />

theory. For string theories L ∼ ℓs <strong>and</strong> E = M2 ∼ N/ℓ2 s . Therefore, ρ ∼ eM/M0<br />

<strong>and</strong> S = ln ρ ∼ √ N, which is in good qualitative agreement with the result in the BH picture.<br />

The BH–string correspondence principle can be extended to higher-dimensional<br />

Schwarzschild BHs <strong>and</strong> also to charged BHs, generalizing at the same time the string picture<br />

to a string/brane picture characterized by the same conserved quantities.<br />

Clearly, this principle underlies the logic of the calculation of entropies of stringy BHs<br />

depicted in Figure 20.1. It works best when there is unbroken supersymmetry (extreme<br />

BHs); it can be argued that the counting of states remains unmodified when we vary g.Inthe<br />

next few sections we are going to construct these d = 4, 5 stringy extreme supersymmetric<br />

BH solutions.<br />

20.2.2 Black holes from wrapped intersecting branes<br />

We have seen that, in order to construct d = 4extreme BH solutions with regular horizons,<br />

we need at least four extended objects that break seven eighths of the supersymmetries.<br />

In d = 5, three are necessary <strong>and</strong>, since this case is a bit simpler <strong>and</strong> the counting of microstates<br />

for it clearer, we are going to start with it.<br />

There are many possible configurations of three extended objects that give rise to a regular<br />

BH in d = 5 upon compactification on T5 . They are related by string (U) dualities in<br />

the five compact dimensions, which appear in d = 5ashidden symmetries of the maximal<br />

N = 4, d = 5 SUEGRA. These symmetries do not act on the Einstein metric (although they<br />

do act on the moduli), thus any of these configurations is equally good for obtaining a BH<br />

metric (the issue of U duality will be studied in Section 20.2.3). Not all the corresponding<br />

d = 10 configurations are equally simple to treat, basically because we do not have good<br />

string descriptions of KK monopoles of S5-branes. D-brane configurations are clearly preferred.<br />

The simplest configurations of this kind are D5 D1 W, as proposed in [208] as a<br />

2 The BH–fundamental-string transition has been studied further in [284, 554, 618, 619].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!