04.06.2013 Views

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

Gravity and Strings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.6 Teleparallelism 147<br />

Lagrangian, <strong>and</strong>, therefore, gives the vacuum Einstein equations. 20 The Lagrangian turns<br />

out to be invariant under not just global but also local Lorentz transformations <strong>and</strong> the only<br />

degrees of freedom left are (we know it) those of the graviton. For general values of the<br />

parameters, the analysis is more complicated <strong>and</strong> it is convenient to start by studying the<br />

linear limit. To this end, we split the Vielbeins into their vacuum (Minkowski) values plus<br />

perturbations. Working in Cartesian coordinates for simplicity, we write<br />

For the inverse Vielbeins, we have<br />

e a µ = δ a µ + A a µ. (4.169)<br />

ea µ = δa µ − δb µ δa ν A b ν + O(A 2 ). (4.170)<br />

To this order we can unambiguously trade curved <strong>and</strong> flat indices <strong>and</strong> the above formula<br />

can be rewritten<br />

ea µ = δa µ − A µ a + O(A 2 ), A µ a ≡ δb µ δa ν A b ν. (4.171)<br />

The metric perturbation that we have called hµν in previous chapters is given by the symmetric<br />

part of A at lowest order:<br />

gµν = ηµν + hµν + O(A 2 ), hµν ≡ 2A(µν), bµν ≡ 2A[µν], Aµν ≡ δaµ A a µ.<br />

(4.172)<br />

With these definitions is straightforward to obtain, up to total derivatives, the linear limit of<br />

action for the Lagrangian density Eq. (4.164):<br />

<br />

ST[h, b] = d d <br />

1<br />

x<br />

16 (2c1 + c2)∂µhνρ∂ µ h νρ − 1<br />

16 (2c1 + c2 − c3)∂µhνρ∂ ν h µρ<br />

− 1<br />

8 c3∂µh∂νh νµ + 1<br />

16 c3(∂h) 2 − 1<br />

16 [4c1 + 2(c2 + c3)]∂µhνρ∂ ρ b νµ<br />

+ 1<br />

16 ∂µbνρ∂ µ b νρ − 1<br />

16 (2c1 − 3c2 − c3)∂µbνρ∂ ρ b νµ<br />

. (4.173)<br />

The first four terms are familiar to us: up to coefficients, they are the same terms as those<br />

that appear in the Fierz–Pauli Lagrangian Eq. (3.84). The last two terms are also well<br />

known: up to coefficients, they are exactly those that appear in the Lagrangian of the Kalb–<br />

Ramond 2-form field, which we still have not seen. The terms in the third line represent a<br />

coupling (already at the linear level) between these two fields.<br />

Now, it is clear that it is not possible to recover solutions of the vacuum Fierz–Pauli<br />

theory if the coupling terms have a non-zero coefficient: a non-vanishing h field is a source<br />

for a non-vanishing b field <strong>and</strong> vice-versa. Thus, the only theories which we expect to be<br />

phenomenologically viable are those in the family<br />

2c1 + c2 + c3 = 0. (4.174)<br />

20 In fact, this theory is sometimes referred to as the teleparallel equivalent of GR.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!